As I stated yesterday, I have been testing a betting strategy ON PAPER. I have used it on 70 games so far, the net effect is positive. Basically, after using the strategy to bet on 70 games, I still have a paper profit. Is 70 an adequate sample size to validate that betting strategy??? If you bet on 70 games and still emerged with a profit, would you conclude that the strategy works, or would you seek to validate it by testing it on more games, say 100, 200, 500??? How many games do you think are enough to confirm whether a betting strategy works or not??? Could the 70 games that I selected be just a “good catch” that is not representative of the total games?? #I am not a gambler. I am just intrigued by betting systems and I like challenging myself, which explains why I haven’t put in any cold hard cash. This is purely for academic reasons.
I thought ni kitu ya maana
We all know you don’t think. Congratulations mate
try 100
If the strategy still yields a profit after 100 games, would you consider it a successful betting strategy? What criteria would you use to interpret your results? e.g
0-10% profit …inconclusive
10%- 20% profit…slightly profitable
Above 20% profit…profitable
??
CT scan?supandeep lens or thermal?..keti pale