Abdulnassir

4h
Ahmednasir
Abdullahi @ahmednasirlaw
Only a 3rd world Court will
overturn the choice of 16
million voters because of a
dispute on the transmission
mode of the result! Shame!!..

This man argues just like me and you.Ngatia is better off

3 Likes

aende apractice hiyo law yake huko first world aone kama atatosha mboga

4 Likes

the root cause is why does the supreme court have 2 jubilee and 5 nasa people. next supreme court must have 2 kikuyus one meru and one kalenjin. i pity those in jail for whatever reasons coz its clear now thst its not about evidence or facts its about who were/was the judge.

1 Like

Hiding your small penis among giants. Go to Liliput. :smiley:

6 Likes

He has the smallest penis around.

1 Like

Upussy!! There was glaring evidence concerning the voter tallying. Report by the registrar is clear. No sober judge would have withheld such election with such mistakes

1 Like

Why were the unsigned 34B forms from coast? It is important to note that forms from coast were the last to arrive at IEBC. Were the ROs influenced not to sign them when they realised that Raila was trailing and therefor wanted to help him incase of petition?

That said, those judges who agreed to this decision have a difficult time writing the judgement. They will have to say why they believe lack of stamps affected number of votes when that was not in contention. If they base their argument on servers, they should show how that changed figures announced at polling stations.

Maraga, Lenaola and Mwilu were very biased even during the proceedings. Maraga even decided unilaterally to increase Orengo’s time during his closing remarks when he was presenting the fake reports. Maraga knew it was a fake report because he had seen the real report.

The kind of decision made today need to be unanimous. Now the court will give two opinions and they will be compared by analysts side by side. It may also lead to serious division within the court

4 Likes

which mistakes? Would you elaborate please, quantitatively.

2 Likes

I believe that their independence was to please someone and not following the law. They were called bandia so to save face the faggot got played. He has a small penis.

2 Likes

They should have tried to convert the dissenting two. How convenient that Ibrahim was sick? I think he tactically avoided making decision on this case

2 Likes

Report his here:[MEDIA=googledrive]0B2rMMQJiqMB8R08tSm5lMWFidTg[/MEDIA]
The report from the servers verification rule leavea one doubting what they were really hiding. Iebc has let us down for real.

1 Like

[QUOTE=“Marty McFly, post: 1191628, member: 16525”]
Hiding your small penis among giants. Go to Liliput. :smiley:
[/QUOTE
meff mungich…nusa tako lako polepole ukisugua na hiyo kende yako…ama ukujie muratina na uwache kusumbua[/QUOTE]

I read that several days ago. But forms were at the polling stations, how did server change those? NASA did not even contest results. How did it affect the number of votes for each candidate?
When you scan your certificates, you still retain your originals. If you send the scanned copy via email and the email is hacked, it does not change your certificate, does it?

5 Likes

It was once said that Ahmednasir forged his papers to practice law he ain’t qualified… mzito ni Ngatia pekee.

I am no IT expert, but could be what was being fed to those machines translated to something else. I believe uhuru had/could have won without such irregularities but then again, how do you ruin the whole elections with such malpractices? I have worked with iebc and I know how strict they are with such. How comes forms go unsigned, no security, no watermark, no stamps etc?

1 Like

Just ask yourself one question, was IEBC depending on server results or manual results ie the physical forms? And if your answer is servers, does that mean that digital takes precedence over manual? So, does that nullify anything to do with physical evidence?

1 Like

Well, it was not depending on the online results. But my only concern is the physical forms. They did what a class 8 dropout can’t do if instructed. That could mean that they were edited to suit what was being transmitted online.

1 Like

At no point did NASA show that the results from the polling stations were doctored, the issues raised in the registrar’s report also confirmed that the figures in the 34Bs were correct, the ruling does not make any sense

1 Like

[SIZE=6][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Accept and move on. We cannot be politicking 24/7. Go back to nation building
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3](every jubilee supporter addressing a NASA supporter after the 8/8 election and 2013)[/SIZE]

3 Likes

[SIZE=6][COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Accept and move on. We cannot be politicking 24/7. Go back to nation building
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3](every jubilee supporter addressing a NASA supporter after the 8/8 election and 2013)[/SIZE]