AH-64 Apache Part One

In the beginning there was a war. The war raged hard and the Americans had to do something to support the troops it was dropping into the theater by helicopter especially the punda UH-1 Huey as they were susceptible to ground fire and were not armoured at all. Tanks were ineffective in the jungle where rapid deployment and support were required and the air force couldnt provide support every time. They had to find a way to provide support the Hueys and the only way to do it was by using an armed helicopter to do it. So they started by arming the Hueys themselves by throwing anything and everything on them. Yes they rose to the challenge but didn’t really cut it

http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/AirShows/Nellis2007/Highlights/Uh1Gunship07.jpg

They even put weapons on a Chinook!!!

http://gunsagogo.org/armament.jpg

A flying elephant that can float, what a sight!!

Back to the topic. So they built the AH-1 which was still a huey with changed cockpit and this one was the first attack helicopter that hata ukionyeshwa silhouette unasema ni attach chopper. This one was armed to the teeth and did its job but those defense guys still felt more can be done. USMC still have theirs and so do others

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_AH-1_Cobra#/media/File:AH-1S_Cobra.jpg
http://army-uk.com/stock/photoarticles/311_AH-1ZViperd.jpg

Apparently, they are also used to fight fire. I’ll find out more

Now the A-10 and the Harrier proved to be superb attack planes and the defense guys felt so too but the army wanted a plane that was still under their control. They couldnt get fixed wing planes as some agreement signed after world war two forbade them from fixed wing planes so they resorted to a smart helicopter that could think like a fixed wing plane. They floated a tender and the tenderpreneurs responded but there’s only one winner. The army wanted a helicopter that could fire and forget (hel+fire = hellfire missile), they wanted it to be maneuverable enough to hug the earth when it is flying and also wanted it to be able to operate in any weather conditions (well, most), they wanted more powerful engines and more lifting capacity for weapons, the pilots should be sitting in a bathtub made of armour and be able to survive a crash landing, or eject when they were at a height where sitting there would be a death trap. They got it.

http://images.military.com/media/equipment/military-aircraft/ah-64-apache-longbow/ah-64-apache-longbow_002.jpg

That hellfire missile made this plane a nightmare to opposing armour as it could hit from considerable distance and had the warhead on that missile was one of a kind then. Able to penetrate tanks (hehe) with the best armour, and it can carry 16 of them. Early hellfires used laser to guide the missile to its target. Even if the target moved, as long as the laser beam is still on it a hit was guaranteed. Best part was the helicopter didnt have to designate the target itself, a ground team could point the beam and all the helicopter had to do was release the weapon. Hit guaranteed. It’s also able to defeat anti aircraft systems of any kind as long as the pilot is superbly trained. Mission time and configuration are as follows

Mission Hellfire 30 mm Hydra 70 Maximum speed Rate of climb Endurance
Anti-Armor 16 1,200 0 148 990 2.5
Guardian 8 1,200 38 150 860 2.5
Escort 0 1,200 76 153 800 2.5

Hellfire- Missile
300mm - Chain gun
Hydra- Rockets
Speed- Knots
RoC- feet/min
Endurance- hours

It can however be armed with anti radiation (used to shoot radar stations) and air to air missiles (for self defense)

However this plane aint that special, as you can see

Helicopter Empty Weight Power (no of engines by power)
AH-64 Apache 5,200 kg (11,500 lb) 2×1,490 kW (2,000 shp)
AH-1 Z Viper 5,600 kg (12,300 lb) 2×1,340 kW (1,800 shp)
AH-1 G Cobra 2,600 kg (5,700 lb) 1×820 kW (1,100 shp)
Mil Mi-28 8,600 kg (19,000 lb) 2×1,636 kW (2,190 shp)
Denel Rooivalk 5,700 kg (12,600 lb) 2×1,420 kW (1,900 shp)

And the Russians Chinese and Israeilis have made sure Americans don’t have all the technology to themselves by developing fire control systems for use in other helos
[ATTACH=full]37466[/ATTACH]

It’s strength does not lie in its physical capabilities. It’s in the technology.

The models I have been describing are the common models. The AH-64 D apache longbow is equipped with a glass cockpit and advanced sensors, the most noticeable of which being the Longbow fire control radar target acquisition system and the Radar Frequency Interferometer ( housed in a dome located above the main rotor. The dome’s raised position enables target detection while the helicopter is behind obstacles (e.g. terrain, trees or buildings). The radar is capable of simultaneously tracking up to 128 targets and engaging up to 16 at once, an attack can be initiated within 30 seconds. A radio integrated with the sensor suite allows data to be shared with ground units and other Apaches; allowing them to fire on targets detected by a single helicopter. The forward fuselage was expanded to accommodate new systems to improve survivability, navigation and ‘tactical internet’ communications capabilities.

The AH-64E Apache has the ability to control UAVs used by the U.S. Army to perform aerial scouting missions previously performed by the OH-58 Kiowa (beautiful bird). Apaches can request to take control of an RQ-7 Shadow or MQ-1C grey eagle from ground control stations to safely scout via datalink communications. There are four levels of UAV interoperability: indirectly receives payload data, 2 receives payload data through direct communication, 3 deploys the UAV’s armaments and 4 takes over flight control. UAVs can search for enemies and, if equipped with a laser designator, target them for the Apache or other friendly aircraft and is fully Instrument Flight Rate capable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_AH-64_Apache#/media/File:AH-64E_Apache-Guardian-0006.jpg
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/pi5l67ftfsvfnigseoja.jpg

Wacha nile supper ndio nirudi kuexplain why it is unnecessary for Kenya to own one now.

CC:

@Meria Mata
@spear
@jumabekavu
@Da Vinci
@imei2012

14 Likes

napenda sana

1 Like

Nice narration, si we make a documentary with you at the Mike.

2 Likes

How useful is it in compensating PEV victims?

1 Like

Lovely

1 Like

Hii ndio hekaya yangu. Ni Uhunye tu apeane ruhusa

1 Like

Looking at youtube videos when they shoot at insurgents why does it appear like the bullets are from another helicopter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHPURnsNPew

1 Like

The defence of this nation is much more important than petty politricks. If you’ve never seen that keti kule------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>

5 Likes

Some of these videos arent directly from the cameras of the helos. The voice could be recorded at HQ and the video from a drone or another helicopter as you’ve seen

1 Like

Thought so but the shaking when bullets/missiles are fired.

1 Like

Never noticed that. Let me find out more

sunymango says, great piece!

1 Like

Safi buda. Huyo Apache nimekubali ndio baba yao

2 Likes

admin should prevent such comments

3 Likes

Safi

1 Like

Hands down when the apache showed up late 80’s to early 90’s, it didn’t have a match and that remained the case for a decade. The Apache was also produced to destroy the USSR armour in Europe. USSR had over 5000 tanks in soviet controlled eastern europe against 1000 nato tanks. My only problem is that of all modern gunships, this is the most expensive $50 million each to buy, arm and maintain. The pilots also have a longer time training for it, its almost like a jet fighter. That and offcourse the only way you have them and keep them flying depends on how friendly you are to usa foreign policy.

Now for us third world countries who still need to build hospitals, roads and power but must adapt our military to protect our nation. The Russian Ka-52 Alligator $29 million is the answer to the Apache. It can be flown by a single pilot, the only chopper with a injection seat to save the pilots, fully armoured, coaxial blade makes it faster and very maneuverable especially from enemy fighter jets. Has two engine but can use one to keep flying etc

http://www.russianhelicopters.aero/upload/im/resize/55968fc1e670fbe4dca65a6366b10efe.jpeg

https://veneremurcernui.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/140904-f-ni493-036.jpg

http://www.aex.ru/imgupl/P6204329.jpg
General Information

The Ka-52 Alligator is a next-generation reconnaissance and combat helicopter designed to destroy tanks, armoured and non-armoured ground targets, and enemy troops and helicopters both on the front line and in tactical reserves. The helicopter can operate around the clock and in all weathers. The Ka-52 can provide target acquisition and designation for helicopter teams and ground troop command and control centres. It can also provide fire support for troop landings, fly routine patrols and escort military convoys.
[ul]
[li]Ka-52 Alligator is fitted with signature control devices as well as electronic and active counter-measures. It meets the latest Russian and international standards for technical operation of military helicopters.[/li][li]The helicopter has a two-seat cockpit and can be flown by either pilot. Its advanced flight capabilities – achieved in part thanks to its coaxial rotors – make the helicopter highly manoeuvrable in limited space and thus able to adopt an advantageous attack position.[/li][li]The Ka-52 Alligator’s two VK-2500 turboshaft engines allow the helicopter to operate at altitudes above 5,000m. It has a static ceiling of 4,000m, and is able to take off and land in hot climates and in high mountainous terrain. The Alligator can also operate in cold climates and icy conditions.[/li][li]The Ka-52 Alligator is equipped with the latest avionics suite and powerful offensive weapons that can be configured for a wide range of combat missions.[/li][li]The Ka-52 Alligator offers a high degree of protection to its crew, advanced automated systems for ease of piloting, and is easy to service and maintain on the ground.[/li][/ul]

4 Likes

Those things look like dragon flies when looked at casually, but in reality they are true behemoths! The camera is not necessarily at the same place where the guns are mounted. They might even be twenty feet apart. I believe, from the documentaries that I have watched, the cameras are usually at the nose. Plus the angle of the firing. I think that’s why it seems like the firing is from a second copter. My amateur thoughts!

1 Like

Put it this way, the alligator, black shark and the Havoc are the only production helicopters with ejection seats but the alligator isn’t the only one. Take a look at this Sikorsky S-72 experiment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLhZN7fTwQQ

Most attack helos meet the other criteria.

When comparing the two in terms of technology, the Longbows and Guardians win even before the contest begins and that is its only but greatest advantage of everything else but with physical terms apache ijipe shughuli. Unfortunately those physical attributes won’t count for much as attack helicopters mainly hover at very low heights above ground level or fly at low speeds in order to take shots. I was surprised South Africa’s Rooivalk has a range of 740km with the apache on 480 km, some things make it a no brainer for someone who doesn’t have sophisticated enemies but a headache to one who has Russia or North Korea on their necks.

The Ka-52 is the two seat variant of the Ka-50 which is single seat. One pilot to fly, designate and fire weapons and still act as observer is a huge load on one person and that’s one reason why the Ka-50 doesn’t have a lot of customers, even mother Russia prefers the havoc. We would have seen the alligator in naval uniform when the French were building helicopter carriers for Russia. Now that they’ve been sold to Egypt and the alligators as well, we have reason to worry.

Why? Its the distance the bullets travel before hitting home. Other explanations being given here are misleading. If it’s more than a kilometre expect more than a one second delay. remember they are looking through a telescope. if they were near, the target would have already run away or hidden from the copter. They know what it is. If any of the targets could hear after the shooting, they heard the the rifle report when down. The bullet arrives first.

Good sales pitch…:smiley:

1 Like