Bensouda's US visa revoked for investigating war crimes against US troops

Habari ndio hio. She was to go to New York to give a report to the UN on war crimes.
Kinyozi akataa kunyolewa.

SitTuliwaambia 2011 siku za ‘choices have conequences’ kwamba USA hawawezi kukubali sheria ya UN?

“We can confirm that the U.S. authorities have revoked the prosecutor’s visa for entry into the U.S.,” Bensouda’s office told Reuters in an e-mail.
It said it understood the move should not impact Bensouda’s travel to the U.S. to meet her United Nations obligations.
The ICC is not a U.N. court (@Nattydread ), but Bensouda travels regularly to brief the U.N. Security Council on cases referred to The Hague by the UN body"

https://kfgo.com/news/articles/2019/apr/04/us-revokes-icc-prosecutors-entry-visa-over-afghanistan-investigation/

You never tire of displaying your ignorance, do you?

[SIZE=5]Relationship with the UN[/SIZE]
[ul]
[li]Article 2 of the Statute provides for the ICC’s relationship with the UN.[/li][li]The UN-ICC Relationship Agreement governs the cooperation between the two organizations[/li][li]General Assembly resolution 58/318 approved the Relationship Agreement between the UN and the ICC, found in document A/58/874 + Add.1.[/li][li]The ICC reports to the General Assembly annually[/li][LIST]
[li]UNBISnet search results[/li][li]example: A/71/342[/li][/ul]
[li]The UN Security Council can refer certain situations to the Prosecutor of the ICC, in accordance with Article 13(b) of the Rome Statute and Chapter VII of the UN Charter[/li][/LIST]
http://ask.un.org/faq/97157

Why do you think that the Late Kofi Annan tried his best to interfere with Kenyan politics in 2008 and thereafter?

War crimes against US troops or by US troops?

I just directly quoted the paper. Look at the quotation marks. And that single statement doesn’t discount your theory.
And fyi Koffi Annan was called here by some goons. He was busy enjoying his coffee in Europe.

US has commited too many atrocities through the military, CIA and private corporation(defence, oil) that overshadow the rest of the world.

The empire of chaos is unravelling at unbelievable speed. From bribing and coercing countries to sign up in the early 2000s to strangling the mongrel in 2019.

Notice that as the buffoons (Trump/Bolton/Pompeo) are chasing the ICC mongrel with sticks, their supposed allies in western Europe are busy signing onto China’s infrastructure bank and silk projects. Brzezinski’s chess game is headed for major losses.

Kenya should take the opportunity to pull out of that colonial kangaroo court. But I don’t think our celeb, love-me-all, prezzo even sees the opportunity…

Pulling out is symbolic only. Citizens can still be prosecuted for atrocities even if their country is not a signatory. This is what most learned people don’t understand. And anyway, what do Kenyans have to hide.
And don’t forget, in the modern world , there are other court processes outside the UN charter.
In fact , the UN has other mechanisms to prosecute you outside the ICC process. I suggest you read about the Khmer Rouge.

Agreed 1000%

Kikikikikikikiki! Tha didn’t take long. BTW what happened to your brag about US roads being among the best in the world?

Ah. Master of English. Kizungu nakushinda Leo. Remember I directly quoted an article. So those were not my words.
As for the roads, I was waiting on your response.

Being a signatory prevents the ICC from interfering with domestic affairs as they did in 2011. Do you think the ICC can investigate crimes against black folks in America? Whether real or imagined?

US have shown other despotic countries what do to when facing ICC investigations.

ICC was invited to Kenya by Kenyans. So technically I dont know what they interfered with.
Crimes against black folks doesnt amount to genocide or displacement. So my guess is that ICC has no jurisdiction. But it doesnt even matter. Kenyans have been polluted into ICC talk ( and single position thinking) by local politicians. ICC is one way the UN can investigate crimes against humanity. It does have other ways. In fact, using the ICC is the weakest method.

ICC is a eu colonial court for controlling Africa. Didn’t bensouda not get that brief from france and germany. If she tries to prosecute bush, blair or israel for war crimes, the usa can directly attack this court.

Since the orange fellow took power, America has lost all moral authority. From climate change to this.
And the fox news watching empty heads will still vote him back to office.

That said, the court should just be disbanded. When the sponsor terminates the cash flow, there is nothing left to do.
Also, no other country will ever willingly take its people there when Uncle Sam has shown us the way.

Even though I believe USA commits war crimes and should be made to pay for those atrocities I don’t support ICC.
Cowardly Uhuru rallied Africans to support him when he was being tried in the Hague then as soon as his charges were dropped he forgot completely that ICC is an imperialist court. He is a very selfish individual.

But the USA is not a member of the ICC. Bensouda anafanya kazi ya bure.