Drumpf: i Didn't Do It..

[MEDIA=twitter]1073205176872435713[/MEDIA]

Usual hilarity ensues…

[ATTACH=full]214791[/ATTACH]

umesahau kale ka-russian 30 yr old spy who was trying to penetrate NRA . though not directly linked to the orange head , she had a role to play

I never directed Michael Cohen to break the law. He was a lawyer and he is supposed to know the law. It is called “advice of counsel,” and a lawyer has great liability if a mistake is made. That is why they get paid. Despite that many campaign finance lawyers have strongly…

The guilty are afraid. If a lawyer advised you to shoot your wife instead of paying that alimony, who’d hang?

Should have posted the rest of the tweets…
He’s trying to disown the lawyer.

[MEDIA=twitter]1073205176872435713[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=twitter]1073207272069890049[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=twitter]1073210823936495617[/MEDIA]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWwLvs7IAMQ

[ATTACH=full]214792[/ATTACH]

When it rains, it pours.

[SIZE=7]Trump Inauguration Spending Under [COLOR=rgb(226, 80, 65)]Criminal Investigation by Federal Prosecutors[/SIZE]

By Rebecca Davis O’Brien, Rebecca Ballhaus and Aruna Viswanatha
Dec. 13, 2018 4:27 p.m. ET

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said.

The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions, some of the people said.

Giving money in exchange for political favors could run afoul of federal corruption laws. Diverting funds from the organization, which was registered as a nonprofit, could also violate federal law.

The investigation represents another potential legal threat to people who are or were in Mr. Trump’s orbit. Their business dealings and activities during and since the campaign have led to a number of indictments and guilty pleas. Many of the president’s biggest campaign backers were involved in the inaugural fund.

The investigation partly arises out of materials seized in the federal probe of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s business dealings, according to people familiar with the matter.

In April raids of Mr. Cohen’s home, office and hotel room, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents obtained a recorded conversation between Mr. Cohen and Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, a former adviser to Melania Trump, who worked on the inaugural events. In the recording, Ms. Wolkoff expressed concern about how the inaugural committee was spending money, according to a person familiar with the Cohen investigation.

The Wall Street Journal couldn’t determine when the conversation between Mr. Cohen and Ms. Wolkoff took place, or why it was recorded. The recording is now in the hands of federal prosecutors in Manhattan, a person familiar with the matter said.

The inaugural committee hasn’t been asked for records or been contacted by prosecutors, according to a lawyer close to the matter, who said: “We are not aware of any evidence the investigation the Journal is reporting actually exists.”

The inaugural committee has publicly identified vendors accounting for $61 million of the $103 million it spent, and it hasn’t provided details on those expenses, according to tax filings. As a nonprofit organization, the fund is only required to make public its top five vendors.

More

Everything us under investigation. Watawai maliza lini???

Nilikua nadhania tu ni Kenya investigeshens huchukua eons…atamaliza second term bado wakichunguza:D

I think Trump is right.

Very vague. He says about 40 things in a day, some contradicting others. On what position are you declaring the man ‘right’?

[SIZE=7][B]Trump offers new alternative facts to explain his problems, but …[/B][/SIZE]

CNN is no longer a cresible source of information…take that article for example…its everywhere and deeply convoluted…its not even clear what its talking about…is it the wall, kashoggi ama lawyers?

I the following true or not?

Trump had ignored the clear conclusion of the CIA that bin Salman was involved in the killing when he issued an exclamation point-laden official statement last month that it was unproven that Saudi Arabia and its crown prince were complicit. It wouldn’t matter anyway, the President said, since Saudi Arabia is buying US military equipment.
Now senators have slapped him on the wrist with Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker’s resolution, passed by voice vote. They more narrowly voted to restricted US support for Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen.

Here is a source that is not CNN, telling you all you need to know about the wall:

President Trump vowed during the campaign that Mexico would pay for the wall. To date, Mexico has not contributed. Other options discussed have included tariffs, a method that USA TODAY NETWORK reporting found would likely put costs back on American consumers.
Congress authorized $292 million in American taxpayer dollars last year, and another $1.4 billion this year. The president is requesting $5 billion more.

https://eu.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2018/12/13/trump-administration-adds-no-new-border-wall-proclaims-victory/2290703002/