So hii maneno yote ni ya 2014 but it was making headlines leo… The case was even prosecuted and determined
http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/128529/
[ATTACH=full]185434[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=full]185433[/ATTACH]
Huyu jamaa fala, he doesn’t know how to hide money.
Wapi inasema case was prosecuted & determined?
:D:D$$$
Tips zikuom?
The kenyalaw link
If you have the connections, even a billion in hard cash can be banked for you within 24 hours, of course after paying a 5% commission. After, remittances can be wired into your local bank account as proceeds from sale of shares etc…
Share sales not such a smart idea …
there must be better ways to cover ones tracks…he was very stupid though…or just got comfortable…almost all his transactions were traceable. He reminds me of Kidero’s county finance guy who also indulged in a property buying spree within a few months in office . The country is littered with such guys…there is another one I know, chief of staff to a sitting governor who has openly bought houses in posh estates and js finalising a multimillion hotel
Hehehe wainaina amenunua mburoti hata huko Kwa kina @FieldMarshal CouchP Kamangu
Shit hole judiciary. I have gone through the ruling and I believe if the judiciary is not fixed, we will get nowhere with this war on sleaze… Read the following extract especially the part in BOLD…:
Having considered the material placed before me, this court takes the following view of this matter. Under Section 56(4) of the Anti-corruption and Economic Crimes Act, this court may discharge or vary an order issued under subsection 4 only if it is satisfied on a balance of probabilities that the property in respect of which the order is discharged or varied was not acquired as a result of corrupt conduct. In other words the Respondents must show on a balance of probabilities that the properties that have been frozen were not acquired as a result of corrupt conduct. In seeking to discharge the exparte freezing orders, the 1st Respondent has by his averments and annexures demonstrated how he started his investments in real estate and establishment of a spares business which enabled him to gain profits which he used to develop real estate business. The 1st Respondent was able to also show that the profits from the aforesaid ventures were used to expand horticulture and animal farming as well as the sale and supply of building and construction materials. The 1stRespondent has further demonstrated that cash deposits made into the 2nd Respondent’s bank account is income derived from the above mentioned sources i.e. farming proceeds and rental incomes. The 1st Respondent has given a detailed summary of the loans taken from various financial institutions and used to acquire and develop various plots. I have carefully perused the replying affidavit filed by the Applicant/Respondent and it is apparent that E.A.C.C did not attempt to rebut any of the documents and averments submitted by the Respondents. The Applicant/ Respondent’s answer to those averments and documents are basically speculative. No credible evidence was submitted of corrupt conduct against the 1st Respondent. A reading of the replying affidavit of James Kamau Kariuki shows that E.A.C.C relied on undisclosed sources and beliefs without stating the grounds on which the belief is held. What has come out clearly from the replying affidavit is that the 1st Respondent is being accused of making false declarations in his wealth declaration forms. It is pointed out that in his declaration forms for 2007-2009 and 2011-2013, it is alleged that the 1st Respondent did not disclose his rental income and some properties therefore this amounts to knowingly making false declarations. I have looked at the provisions of Section 28 of the Public Officer Ethics Act, 2003, and it is apparent that the Act contemplates that a public officer may inadvertently omit certain information in the wealth declaration and accordingly gives leeway to the commission to seek clarifications within 6 months from the date of the declaration by the public officer. There is no evidence that the 1stRespondent was ever required to make any clarifications relating to any of his wealth declarations. Through the current motion, the 1stRespondent has stated that the omissions E.A.C.C has pointed out relating to his wealth declarations were inadvertent and not intended to be false nor to mislead. In any case section 31 of the aforesaid Act envisages a judicial process where a public officer is subjected to criminal charges for knowingly making false and misleading declarations which is not the case here. In my humble appreciation of the Applicant/Respondent’s response to the Respondents’/ Applicants’ motion, E.A.C.C has not displaced the averments made by the Respondents nor has E.A.C.C. tendered credible evidence to demonstrate, specify and particularise the allegations of corruption against the 1st Respondent. In other words there is no serious attempt on the part of the Applicant/Respondent to carry out investigations to link the Respondents with the act of corruption. It is clear from the pleadings and the submissions that the Applicant/ Respondent is heavily relying on inferences to form the opinion that the 1st Respondent acquired and developed the properties mentioned herein by corrupt conduct. In my view, though these proceedings are civil in nature, the allegation levelled against the 1stRespondent is the commission of corruption, which is a serious offence. The threshold is therefore high and the Applicant/Respondent cannot solely rely on inferences to establish such an offence.
hehe hizi zinapatikana bank within seconds na saa hizo umezificha in separate accounts in different branches under different names! Hio idea yako ya shares… hata watacheka how easy you made it for them. Na unasahau utapelekwa pale CID kwanza for questioning. Uliona vile Francis Mburu alitoka interrogation ni kama mtu ameharibika kichwa? Its because they knew everything, all the secrets! Hata za 1983. Uliona kwa Wanjigi vile waliingia? And they weren’t even looking for looted money in that instance. If a determined journalist can catch you (even a president) like they did in Watergate now imagine state machinery…
To hide money is a talent. Either you have extreme power or a small army because if a govt. is truly determined to find stolen loot wataipata tu. Hata iwe Switzerland ama offshore. Na wasipoipata they’ll make sure you never spend it. That’s if that govt. is truly anticorruption. Hata Cayman utawekewa mitego huko, umepanda ndege ati no one is watching. And you are not asking yourself how comes no one is stopping you. Ngoja ufike cayman utoe…
Ukiona pablo escobar na tony soprano wakichimba mashimo na kuzika pesa jua hakuna mchezo.In pablo’s case he had an army to protect those holes. But mwishowe hata wao walisahau where the holes were, ikaliwa na mchwa. And his family was left broke. And this was a man who had access to the most high tech offshore money laundering financial systems… na bado hio pesa ilikuwa offshore DEA na colombia govt. waliipata wakagawana.
Baba, courts are bound to rule based on the law and the evidence before them. Hizi zingine zote are boardroom politics.
Ukitaka kuona huyo jamaa kuja Homebase pale Gikambura. Jama has a petrol station nearby.