Here is a very sobering explanation.
[ATTACH=full]345918[/ATTACH]s
I guess Ethiopia was colonised too.
[ATTACH=full]345921[/ATTACH]
If you ever hear anyone trying to blame African laziness and stupidity on white men, please remind him that he is thinking with his anus.
Wasn’t Botswana colonized?
So who’s gonna tellim Botswana is in Africa? No one? Mkay then:rolleyes:
I wanna suck on them titties
Better be quick on them contortionist classes then. Your tits is waiting girl!
Without the whiteman we would not have African countries mixed with tribes that hate each other. We would have formed our states naturally with people who share culture or common purpose. All our problems are brought by our differences
Colonialism happened… now deal with it and stop whinning!
Ati “ohhh ohhhh Africa would be this… ohhh ohhh Africa would be that” ni upus!
So the Somalis have a country to themselves. Somalis only country. How is that working for them?
They did not identify as one country before colonisation. they lived separately from each other and were not that peaceful
Good point. So you are saying to forget the tribes, you want each clan to be a country?
Very few Africans tribes saw the need for centralised states.
And the few centralised states that existed were in a near permanent state of war with each other eg Ethiopia’s current problems
Without colonisation, we would have continued living the tribal life in our ethnic conclaves oblivious to the existence of the outer world.
Colonialism had both negatives and positives.
No I am saying without the white man they would be living separately and not killing each other.
True we still dont see the need for centralised state that is why our idea of a centralised state is the abusive colonial state
What was wrong with that? And we knew about the rest of the world we traded with them and visited other continents
I think someone with such a notion would fit in better in one of the undiscovered tribes of the amazon. The GDP in those tribes is very low.