Hitsblunt-What if white people are just...

#1
...afraid that without the guns black men and women will take up arms to revenge their history. Afraid that history may come tu collect. Hence they refuse to give up their guns confirming their cowardice. They call me the real voice and this are the views from cloud 9.
 
Y

Yunomi

Guest
#4
...afraid that without the guns black men and women will take up arms to revenge their history. Afraid that history may come tu collect. Hence they refuse to give up their guns confirming their cowardice. They call me the real voice and this are the views from cloud 9.
The white man knows he is only able to consume 65% of the world's resources despite being less than 20% of the world's population because of the weapons he has. His weapons allow him to stay greedy.

Do you think the Kikuyu would have ceded to him even an inch of their land if the mzungu didn't have superior weapons and aided by a section of Kikuyu and Kamba homeguards ?
Slavery as an institution did not exist amongst the Agĩkũyũ, nor did they (Arabs) make raids for the capture of slaves. The Arabs who tried to venture into Agĩkũyũ land met instant death.
Weapons turn a coward into a ruler. It is for this reason that the white man spends billions of dollars researching weapons and the rest of his money is spent into destabilizing other nations so that they cannot start building their own weapons.
 

sakwa

Village Elder
#5
I am black but I can assure you guns or not, the black man can never beat the white man.... the problem with black people is they think going physical wins anything, completely forgetting all important fights are won with the strike of a PEN.

so fucking stupid....
 
Y

Yunomi

Guest
#6
I am black but I can assure you guns or not, the black man can never beat the white man.... the problem with black people is they think going physical wins anything, completely forgetting all important fights are won with the strike of a PEN.

so fucking stupid....
The colonists did not come with pens, they came with guns. This fact basically trashes your whole comment.
 

sakwa

Village Elder
#7
The colonists did not come with pens, they came with guns. This fact basically trashes your whole comment.

So you think the few hundreds of white people with guns were the colonists??? that is ridiculous.. the actual colonists never left Europe.

The number of white people here were so few to the extend that if it was just a physical to physical fight, Africans would have won on day one, I mean, the rifles of those days were not even automatic....

The colonial powers had strategic plans, they could see the BIG PICTURE and it involved sponsoring missionaries to come to convince Africans that they are not civilized and need to be westernized, bringing clothes, education, building roads, rails... that is how they took over... mainly through propaganda, through the PEN
 
Y

Yunomi

Guest
#8
So you think the few hundreds of white people with guns were the colonists??? that is ridiculous.. the actual colonists never left Europe.

The number of white people here were so few to the extend that if it was just a physical to physical fight, Africans would have won on day one, I mean, the rifles of those days were not even automatic....

The colonial powers had strategic plans, they could see the BIG PICTURE and it involved sponsoring missionaries to come to convince Africans that they are not civilized and need to be westernized, bringing clothes, education, building roads, rails... that is how they took over... mainly through propaganda, through the PEN
Guns were a must to colonise us. Without guns nobody would have agreed to be colonised.
Had they come with bows and arrows they would have suffered the same fate that met the Arabs who attempted to come capture slaves.
 

sakwa

Village Elder
#9
Guns were a must to colonise us. Without guns nobody would have agreed to be colonised.
Had they come with bows and arrows they would have suffered the same fate that met the Arabs who attempted to come capture slaves.

Nobody ever captured slaves, slaves were always sold by fellow Africans...ata slavery ikarudishwa tena, you would see african selling there poor tribemen again...bado hatujapita hapo, you don't know your history
 
Y

Yunomi

Guest
#10
Nobody ever captured slaves, slaves were always sold by fellow Africans...ata slavery ikarudishwa tena, you would see african selling there poor tribemen again...bado hatujapita hapo, you don't know your history
Let me deal with this before I deal with other problematic parts of your arguments.
In the East Coast of Africa slaves were being captured and brought to the Middle East

Screenshot_2019-07-14-12-25-23-494_com.android.chrome.png
 
#11
...afraid that without the guns black men and women will take up arms to revenge their history. Afraid that history may come tu collect. Hence they refuse to give up their guns confirming their cowardice. They call me the real voice and this are the views from cloud 9.
57% of Blacks live in the South.
Where states have the most liberal gun laws on the planet. Starting with Texas where even felons can own a gun 5 years after leaving prison to Florida where there is no limit to the number of Guns to towns like Chennesaw, Georgia which is 22% Black and where it is compulsory to own a gun.
So what are you talking about???
 
#12
Nobody ever captured slaves, slaves were always sold by fellow Africans...ata slavery ikarudishwa tena, you would see african selling there poor tribemen again...bado hatujapita hapo, you don't know your history
That applies to West and Central Africa where Africans did sell other Africans to the Europeans and in the case of Eastern Congo and Northern West Africa, to the Arabs. But on the East African Coast, Arabs and Swahilis often did the enslaving themselves.
 
#13
Nobody ever captured slaves, slaves were always sold by fellow Africans...ata slavery ikarudishwa tena, you would see african selling there poor tribemen again...bado hatujapita hapo, you don't know your history
The first europeans in Africa were Portuguese and they did go on slave raids in west africa, congo and mozambique but were often beaten. The europeans even went on slave raids in China but was also kicked. They only changed their strategy after by working with tribes who had prisoners of war from other tribes and they suplied things such as weapons which meant that more tribal wars and slaves. Also slavery in the west and africa wasn’t the same, African nations didnt have chattel slavery unlike the west and the enslavement in Africa was more like indentured servitude for example the first official slave in the british colonies is regarded as John Punch who was an indentured servant but was made a slave for life when he tried to escape with other 2 white people(also indentured servants but they got other setences and this situation is regarded as one of the first distinction between blacks and whites in the british colonies in N.A ). Turning blacks into slaves happened gradual in the british colonies and before that you had africans such as Anthony Johnson who got free of their inventured servitude and bought land and lived like the whites in the american colonies. The only place in Africa that had slavery recembled to that of Europeans were arabs in Nubian region(Sudan).
 
#14
White people dont need guns, low IQ blacks will sellout Africa to them either way. Imagine all good African leaders who have been assassinated with support from whites, the collaborators have been low IQ blacks. If we say it was blacks selling blacks then we can say that today its is blacks robbing blacks out of their resources in Africa, same things. You all low IQ blacks in the comment section are your own faults for your situations in Africa. Its like in WW2 in France, it was whites selling out whites to the germans.
 
Last edited:

Top