Social anthropology evokes very interesting questions...is love a delusion or reality? Ladies shoot..........
Very intriguing things happen when we socialize, particularly in the world of romance...particularly the selection of men by women.....
Ladies....so does your selection of man come as a regurgitation of the same invisible script...or is each instance of love fully independent?
9 out of 10 times women will pick the same guys over and over;
often times attractions that come very quickly...vanish even quicker;
Often it happens that on perhaps 80% of the women will about entirely focus on maybe 10% of the men(the precise percentages not as much important as the implications)....
Let's create a figurative "script"... and it's obviously by no means literally as such,but rather predominantly so...you get the point........
Top Menu Choice:
Tall, Handsome,in shape, confident "alpha male", decisive, funny, and quick to wit.....Let's coin this "man" Romeo......
Romeo would happen to be maybe one sixth of "Men" in general...
The script will perhaps be used by three quarters of women...
An a priori or rather self-evident assessment of the foregoing crowns Romeo as the king...
Romeo is fully aware of the fact and chuckles;
A customized podium has exclusively been reserved for "Romeo";
Men and women alike I should be sure would agree:
A replaceable item is let go of much quicker than an irreplaceable one; common sense would dictate...
Disclaimer: Common sense is not necessarily applicable in the romance department..some would claim...lol
The Million Dollar question: What is your expectation of Romeo in terms of longevity of the two romantic love birds?
By carefully analyzing everything you have seen above, please answer the following question:
"Do players simply exist independently or do you create them?"
Of course there is usually the notion that men are much more guilty than women in usury...but how does that become the case when you really think about it?
Very intriguing things happen when we socialize, particularly in the world of romance...particularly the selection of men by women.....
Ladies....so does your selection of man come as a regurgitation of the same invisible script...or is each instance of love fully independent?
9 out of 10 times women will pick the same guys over and over;
often times attractions that come very quickly...vanish even quicker;
Often it happens that on perhaps 80% of the women will about entirely focus on maybe 10% of the men(the precise percentages not as much important as the implications)....
Let's create a figurative "script"... and it's obviously by no means literally as such,but rather predominantly so...you get the point........
Top Menu Choice:
Tall, Handsome,in shape, confident "alpha male", decisive, funny, and quick to wit.....Let's coin this "man" Romeo......
Romeo would happen to be maybe one sixth of "Men" in general...
The script will perhaps be used by three quarters of women...
An a priori or rather self-evident assessment of the foregoing crowns Romeo as the king...
Romeo is fully aware of the fact and chuckles;
A customized podium has exclusively been reserved for "Romeo";
Men and women alike I should be sure would agree:
A replaceable item is let go of much quicker than an irreplaceable one; common sense would dictate...
Disclaimer: Common sense is not necessarily applicable in the romance department..some would claim...lol
The Million Dollar question: What is your expectation of Romeo in terms of longevity of the two romantic love birds?
By carefully analyzing everything you have seen above, please answer the following question:
"Do players simply exist independently or do you create them?"
Of course there is usually the notion that men are much more guilty than women in usury...but how does that become the case when you really think about it?
