journalists

Status
Not open for further replies.

kalel

Village Elder
#1
So there was an expose' Jana on K T N about the Garissa massacre and the glaring lapses in security,my question is where does the journalist's obligation to protect their source end and where does their obligation to society begin.
How can you interview a self-proclaimed al-shabab with intimate knowledge about the attack and probably is privy to alot more info on planned attacks and afterwards just pack up ur tripod and camera and go home after doing ur 'job'.
Given a chance i would snitch on those mofo's on the spot.
My 2 cents
 

Ice_Cube

Village Chief
#2
They snitch and will never get the opportunity to interview such and get their hands on exclusives. Imagine if ross kemp snitched? His career will be over.
 
O

Owuadn

Guest
#3
When it comes to national security, all bets are off. The journalist with information should be tortured until they reveal who killed Kenyans and who is about to kill Kenyans.


Professional integrity is not superior to lives of Kenyans.
 

kalel

Village Elder
#5
priorites are warped then......so u let the s.o.b go back butcher innocent people look for him then interview them...
 
L

Luther12

Guest
#6
Zimwi Kiamboni. It was more about Mandera than Garissa.

Isn't it sad, really, that a mere journalist is able to go to the bushes and talk to 'alleged' Shabab operatives/sympathizers while the much-vaunted government machinery that is represented there daily can't? What does that say about the competence of the men and women we entrust our national affairs with?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top