JWST proves that The Big Bang never occurred

To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old. Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”

Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”

Full article:
[MEDIA=facebook]10160119196331170[/MEDIA]

Those pictures are nowhere near the big bang. The JWST has yet to peer to within a few million years to the big bang if ever. This is due to the rapid expansion of the universe in space and time.

Big bang was 14b years ago while JWST peered to galaxies 13.6b light years away. Meaning that the images should have shown us how the young galaxies looked like only 0.1-0.3b years after formation. But the galaxies look old, small, big and smooth. Just like ours and those in our local group. Meaning there’s a lot that the Big Bang theory doesn’t explain or it never happened

Religious diehards will never relent in their efforts to impede science and research. Always putting a damper on every new suggestion or even every new theory but they never provide any logically viable alternatives.

Man knows nothing

Science fiction always forgets to carry along their facts, I saw about 5 photos of their favourite planet Saturn which they termed as very beautiful. No sign of motion on its axis, no sign of motion in space, they are very silent on planet orbits and the universe expanding.

Word!!! Yeah,we know how that plays too on the other side of the spectrum,just thumping and no credible evidence. Like i said,man knows nothing,he wants to find his purpose so he needs a terminus a quo

The writer is a scientist with a diverse idea about the origin of the universe. He is not a religious diehard

correction…we dont know whether it happened and we dont know whether it did not happen