Martha Karua has criticised Justice Njoki Ndung'u over her dissenting judgement on the nullified presidential election.
Karua has expressed dismay that Njoki chose to attack her colleagues who nullified the election instead of focusing on her judgement.
Njoki said her peers erred in nullifying Uhuru's win and that they did not look at the evidence provided by IEBC - Karua has also criticised Uhuru and Raila for chosing what to accept or reject from the ruling NARC Kenya leader and former Kirinyaga governor aspirant Martha Karua has attacked Supreme Court Judge Njoki Ndung'u over her judgement on the cancelled election. Karua has taken issue with Njoki's dissenting judgement which she delivered alongside her colleagues at the court on Wednesday, September 20.
Njoki seemed to criticise the decision by four of her colleagues to nullified Uhuru's win as she said they failed to look at the evidence tabled by the respondents in the petition filed by the NASA coalition. Martha Karua has taken issue with Njoki's dissenting judgement which she delivered alongside her colleague.
Uhuru's lawyers planning to overturn Supreme Court judgement that nullified presidential election In her over 400-page judgement, she said the nullified election was conducted within the law and her colleagues were wrong to nullify it on technicalities. Karua is not impressed by her judgement. Karua believes Njoki erred in criticising Chief Justice David Maraga, Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu and Justices Smokin Wanjala and Isaac Lenaola who nullified Uhuru's win. Martha Karua says Njoki should have focused on her judgement, not attacking her peers.
Karua has expressed dismay that Njoki chose to attack her colleagues who nullified the election instead of focusing on her judgement.
Njoki said her peers erred in nullifying Uhuru's win and that they did not look at the evidence provided by IEBC - Karua has also criticised Uhuru and Raila for chosing what to accept or reject from the ruling NARC Kenya leader and former Kirinyaga governor aspirant Martha Karua has attacked Supreme Court Judge Njoki Ndung'u over her judgement on the cancelled election. Karua has taken issue with Njoki's dissenting judgement which she delivered alongside her colleagues at the court on Wednesday, September 20.
Njoki seemed to criticise the decision by four of her colleagues to nullified Uhuru's win as she said they failed to look at the evidence tabled by the respondents in the petition filed by the NASA coalition. Martha Karua has taken issue with Njoki's dissenting judgement which she delivered alongside her colleague.
Uhuru's lawyers planning to overturn Supreme Court judgement that nullified presidential election In her over 400-page judgement, she said the nullified election was conducted within the law and her colleagues were wrong to nullify it on technicalities. Karua is not impressed by her judgement. Karua believes Njoki erred in criticising Chief Justice David Maraga, Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu and Justices Smokin Wanjala and Isaac Lenaola who nullified Uhuru's win. Martha Karua says Njoki should have focused on her judgement, not attacking her peers.
