1. Mwilu clearly stated that she made her decision based on assumptions and not facts........"What If those numbers were generated by the forms in doubt?" Exact wording itapatikana kwa full ruling. She actually said haijalishi kama there was a clear winner or not! (meaning the numbers are not necessarily in doubt)
2. Maraga shifted blame to the IEBC lawyers ati they did not understand nor respond to the allegations. He also blamed Bunge for not increasing time for presidential petitions ati hakuna time ya kuitisha recount (an argument destroyed by Njoki Ndungu) So he is in effect saying, my hand were tied.
3. Jackton wiped the floor with the majority's argument in a very convincing, and demeaning, way. The entire bench looked like kids in remedial while the teacher introduces advanced calculus.
4. Fake forms were admitted, fake affidavits processed yet no one is culpable!
5. Finally, the most interesting bit. Either Njoki lied or the majority were grossly incompetent. Both ways, the JSC must see to it that heads roll! Let us see how far the JSC will push Article 160 clause 5 of the constitution that reads thus:
(5) A member of the Judiciary is not liable in an action or suit
in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in good faith in the
lawful performance of a judicial function.
2. Maraga shifted blame to the IEBC lawyers ati they did not understand nor respond to the allegations. He also blamed Bunge for not increasing time for presidential petitions ati hakuna time ya kuitisha recount (an argument destroyed by Njoki Ndungu) So he is in effect saying, my hand were tied.
3. Jackton wiped the floor with the majority's argument in a very convincing, and demeaning, way. The entire bench looked like kids in remedial while the teacher introduces advanced calculus.
4. Fake forms were admitted, fake affidavits processed yet no one is culpable!
5. Finally, the most interesting bit. Either Njoki lied or the majority were grossly incompetent. Both ways, the JSC must see to it that heads roll! Let us see how far the JSC will push Article 160 clause 5 of the constitution that reads thus:
(5) A member of the Judiciary is not liable in an action or suit
in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in good faith in the
lawful performance of a judicial function.
