Non-Believers

Status
Not open for further replies.
#4
Great! Sure thing i mean that. i consider myself as an agnostic. I would like to have a good debate with believers and i see you are a bird of the same feather as mine.
 

sam

Senior Villager
#12
Everybody should prove for himself what is the truth and whats not, nobody should prove for you, i have convinced myself of what i know and i know what i know, period.
 

jameson

Senior Villager
#13
One example, take a look at living creatures, he basic building block is the cell, the cell consists of various types of complex and simple proteins, right now with the advanced knowledge humans have achieved, no factory can create a simple protein, why because its far too difficult.Now if its this difficult, how can it's coming about be attributed to mindless evolution (chance), do you see where i'm headed?
 
#14
There is a Buddhist philosophy that states "one should not believe something simply for the sake of believing it, but only if it can somehow be demonstrated as true, if it can be realised in some practical way" the floor is yours @jameson give us a cognitively meaningful explanation that can be logically and empirically proven!
 

jameson

Senior Villager
#16
Okay, then why don't you explain from your own perspective where everything came from..and i will prove by contradiction.
 
#19
Am agnostic. Many a time i have been bashed as a wishy-washy fence sitter. I detest ruling out things with certainty and i can explain them empirically. I might vouch for your creation story (it surely does make a good fairly-tale for kids) but there some ridiculously discrepancies in it. I could go with the Big bang theory or the evolution but there too many holes in them. I guess i will just sit on the fence till a good explanation surfaces.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top