Origins Of the Feminazi

[Rene_Descartes]

The True Original Extent and End of the Feminazi

The problem is firstly political, and to a much less extent, social. It is not as simple as Africans borrowing from social failures existing in the fringes of western society as suggested by @girlciki93 .

Women have always been empowered by the political class, who, when cornered, will do anything to survive the moment. For example, an oracle or a king holding dominion over a territory would rather lie to people that its okay for his daughter to succeed him rather than have the power change properly into the hands of another able patriarch from another family. There you have your queens, female regents, 10 year old boy kings, and that kind of chieth. Its for the same reason royal families are very inbred(Ancient Egypt). This is a problem of monarchical systems. In Kenya, and in tribes that did not have those autocratic rulers, you can observe that government was by a council of men. There existed no chance that a woman or a dumb young man would tell people what to do.
Now, away from that. Modern feminism arose from the insatiable political and economic greed. In the natural course of politics, all you do is rally households to your side. This means you need to convince the leaders of households that your ideas are best even in the long term. This is quite inconvenient because these leaders of households are naturally men. You cant bullshit a man that easily.
Now because you cant convince a man that his wife should head the household, and because not many women want to head households anyway, you can convince men and their households that women ought to earn some living and make things easier for men. Good! You now have working women, women paying taxes independently, and women wanting rights to vote. Quite harmless, give women right to vote, right to have political seats, and such. Now you have managed to divide and rule the family unit, the household. Once you break families into individuals, you can do anything with them because they are very weak as the basic units of society.

1. Spending in the household can be easily be manipulated with women having a 50% or greater say on economic matters of the household. For example, a windfall income to the household will now be easily invested in consumer stuff that disappear quickly or become obsolete instead of buying land or building a house. You buying land or building a house actually makes your leader less powerful and makes big business poorer
2. Men cannot determine the future of their households without having an external opinion being injected through the women of the households by (media, church, leader, friends, feminazi organizations, anybody else that can impress).

3. A society organized this way will have women wanting as much say as the men in everything.

Naturally, in this kind of a setting no one is happy; not the feminazi, not the man. Ndo unasikia feminazi zinalia, ndume zinalia. women want to kill men or eat them alive if they could and men want to have that one important thing from women without getting in the mix too deep. The more this continues, the more the political class and the big business thrive and grow fatter. The sole aim of the progressive agenda is to break families into individuals. Individuals are weaker. You can use anything, religion, gaysim, feminism(feminazism), Sexualization of everything, money and ideals of individual success, anything selfish, etc.
While MGTOW have their truths, advocating that men run away is acceptance of failure. The only solution is the absolute understanding of the problem by a majority of people. Not running away and certainly not killing people.

As Africans borrow political and economic ideals wholesale from western society(Equality and big business), side effects such as feminazism will automatically emerge. They don’t have to be taught by anyone.

Its not a conspiracy by a small group of men, but a failure of whole societies through one or another unfortunate ways they use to select and maintain leaders. The other reason is that people are born absolutely ignorant and you can put whatever you want in their skulls.

[hcaikp]

I have tried to read and come with some form of connection with Feminazi, but doesn’t make sense mukubwa.

[Rene_Descartes]

@hcaikp

I have tried to read and come with some form of connection with Feminazi, but doesn’t make sense mukubwa.

Probably glossed over.

[uwesmake]

ntsoma saturday before mechi ya manchieth united

[girlciki93]

@Rene Descartes

The True Original Extent and End of the Feminazi

The problem is firstly political, and to a much less extent, social. It is not as simple as Africans borrowing from social failures existing in the fringes of western society as suggested by @girlciki93 .

Women have always been empowered by the political class, who, when cornered, will do anything to survive the moment. For example, an oracle or a king holding dominion over a territory would rather lie to people that its okay for his daughter to succeed him rather than have the power change properly into the hands of another able patriarch from another family. There you have your queens, female regents, 10 year old boy kings, and that kind of chieth. Its for the same reason royal families are very inbred(Ancient Egypt). This is a problem of monarchical systems. In Kenya, and in tribes that did not have those autocratic rulers, you can observe that government was by a council of men. There existed no chance that a woman or a dumb young man would tell people what to do.
Now, away from that. Modern feminism arose from the insatiable political and economic greed. In the natural course of politics, all you do is rally households to your side. This means you need to convince the leaders of households that your ideas are best even in the long term. This is quite inconvenient because these leaders of households are naturally men. You cant bullshit a man that easily.
Now because you cant convince a man that his wife should head the household, and because not many women want to head households anyway, you can convince men and their households that women ought to earn some living and make things easier for men. Good! You now have working women, women paying taxes independently, and women wanting rights to vote. Quite harmless, give women right to vote, right to have political seats, and such. Now you have managed to divide and rule the family unit, the household. Once you break families into individuals, you can do anything with them because they are very weak as the basic units of society.

1. Spending in the household can be easily be manipulated with women having a 50% or greater say on economic matters of the household. For example, a windfall income to the household will now be easily invested in consumer stuff that disappear quickly or become obsolete instead of buying land or building a house. You buying land or building a house actually makes your leader less powerful and makes big business poorer
2. Men cannot determine the future of their households without having an external opinion being injected through the women of the households by (media, church, leader, friends, feminazi organizations, anybody else that can impress).

3. A society organized this way will have women wanting as much say as the men in everything.

Naturally, in this kind of a setting no one is happy; not the feminazi, not the man. Ndo unasikia feminazi zinalia, ndume zinalia. women want to kill men or eat them alive if they could and men want to have that one important thing from women without getting in the mix too deep. The more this continues, the more the political class and the big business thrive and grow fatter. The sole aim of the progressive agenda is to break families into individuals. Individuals are weaker. You can use anything, religion, gaysim, feminism(feminazism), Sexualization of everything, money and ideals of individual success, anything selfish, etc.
While MGTOW have their truths, advocating that men run away is acceptance of failure. The only solution is the absolute understanding of the problem by a majority of people. Not running away and certainly not killing people.

As Africans borrow political and economic ideals wholesale from western society(Equality and big business), side effects such as feminazism will automatically emerge. They don’t have to be taught by anyone.

Its not a conspiracy by a small group of men, but a failure of whole societies through one or another unfortunate ways they use to select and maintain leaders. The other reason is that people are born absolutely ignorant and you can put whatever you want in their skulls.

hii ni upuss umeandika.
What Happened is that continued economic growth was needed. There was a simple solution. Rope in half of the population that was always left out. So girls were put through school, no dropping out because you have no money for female hygiene. No missing out because parents favor educating the male. Equalization.
Then these women now educated had to be empowered. Like when Kenya legally allowed inheritance of land by girls. Or the 2/3rds gender rule. Do you know that women still need “male” overseer to get loan for business all across the World?
As for breaking up family, that’s not true. You see, women always have higher standards than men when it comes to almost everything. And an educated woman really expects a lot. It’s why they say empower a woman empower a society. Standards go up. Educate a woman in ushago or a woman in the slums and she’ll be looking at men from beyond the limitation of where she lives. The result is that men have to go the extra mile to retain attraction. The family isn’t breaking, it’s men who collectively are becoming weaker mostly because they have lost leverage. They used to be economically dominant in the household, wife had no savings no true income so she could be kicked out anytime. Also not much legal rights. That has changed. Out of it should come challenged men not whiners

[fisi_fc]

@girlciki93

hii ni upuss umeandika.
What Happened is that continued economic growth was needed. There was a simple solution. Rope in half of the population that was always left out. So girls were put through school, no dropping out because you have no money for female hygiene. No missing out because parents favor educating the male. Equalization.
Then these women now educated had to be empowered. Like when Kenya legally allowed inheritance of land by girls. Or the 2/3rds gender rule. Do you know that women still need “male” overseer to get loan for business all across the World?
As for breaking up family, that’s not true. You see, women always have higher standards than men when it comes to almost everything. And an educated woman really expects a lot. It’s why they say empower a woman empower a society. Standards go up. Educate a woman in ushago or a woman in the slums and she’ll be looking at men from beyond the limitation of where she lives. The result is that men have to go the extra mile to retain attraction. The family isn’t breaking, it’s men who collectively are becoming weaker mostly because they have lost leverage. They used to be economically dominant in the household, wife had no savings no true income so she could be kicked out anytime. Also not much legal rights. That has changed. Out of it should come challenged men not whiners

If the family isn’t breaking up then how do you explain the rising divorce rates?

[girlciki93]

@fisi fc

If the family isn’t breaking up then how do you explain the rising divorce rates?

let’s see
money is the biggest source of contention in a relationship.
most men and women are poor money managers.
Thus they won’t last.
Difference kitambo was that man had all economic power (so woman couldn’t leave) and anyway divorce was looked down upon. That is what has changed.
Be in a financially responsible relationship and see how good it is.