I have been conducting some research on which one of these 4 SUVs is best to buy. This is what I have gathered so far and thought it’s important to share it so that anyone looking for a reference point can benefit from it.
Disclaimer: This a one-person research, so I might be biased, some of the figures used may vary, all comparisons are for automatic transmission cars.
Toyota RAV4 (Price Estimate for a 2012: Ksh2.3 Million)
11.5KM/L (Highway) 179hp - 50ltr tank capacity, cheap interior, seat could be better adjustable, good consumption for its size, good stability, reliable car for climbing hills, decent boot space. Easy to maintain. Acceleration: 0-60mph = 8.5 seconds. Ground Clearance: 8.7 inch. Kerb: 1630KG +/-.
Pros
Highly reliable
Easy to maintain
Good ground clearance for Kenyan roads
Cons
Expensively priced
Honda CRV (Price Estimate for a 2012: Ksh2.3 Million)
12KM/L (Highway) - 190hp, 50ltr tank capacity, moderate interior, uncomfortable than RAV4, good consumption, not as stable, can be used on hills, decent boot space. Not easy to maintain. Acceleration: 0-60mph = 7.5 seconds. Ground Clearance: 6.7 inch. Kerb: 1523KG +/-.
Pros
Better interior than Rav4
Better consumption than Rav4
Slightly bigger boot than Rav4
Cons
Expensively priced
Expensive to maintain
Less reliable
Less stable
Low ground clearance (comparatively)
Mazda CX-5 (Price Estimate for a 2012: Ksh1.9 Million)
12KM/L (Highway) - 184hp, 55ltr tank capacity, great interior, good consumption better than RAV4, Feels unstable on low-traction surfaces, Decent hill climbing power in “sport” mode, small bootie, Not easy to maintain. Acceleration: 0 - 60 = 6.4 seconds. Ground Clearance: 7.5 inch. Kerb: 1,500KG +/-.
Pros
Cheaply priced
Best interior so far
Excellent consumption
Cons
Less reliable on low-traction surfaces
Expensive to maintain since Skyactive technology still new in Ke
Good ground clearance but could been better for Ke road situations.
Subaru Forester (Price Estimate for a 2012: Ksh2 Million Non-Turbo & Ksh2.6 Million for Turbo-XT)
11KM/L (Highway) - 170hp (non-turbo) &224 for XT (Turbo), 60ltr tank capacity, average interior, poorer consumption than RAV4, stable than Rav4, can be reliable on hills esp with Turbo, smaller bootspace than Rav4, expensive to maintain. Acceleration: 0 -60 = 8.5 Seconds (non-turbo). 0 -60 = 6 Seconds (Turbo). Ground Clearance: 8.7 inches. Kerb: 1,630KG +/-.
Pros
Highly stable
Awesome ground clearance just like RAV4
Cons
Poor consumption
Non turbo option is quite weak
Turbo option i.e. XT or STi quite pricey
Expensive to maintain.
OVERALL VERDICT
The RAV4 (Best Overall) remains the most reliable SUV to this end. It’s cheap to maintain, reasonably powerful, has got a good resale value, a decent kerb weight, and awesome stability at legal speeds, good boot space. That said, it’s relatively slower off-the-blocks (compared to its arch rivals), but unless you’re doing 100 meter dashes, chances are that you’ll not even notice this. Unfortunately, it doesn’t come cheap due to the “Toyota ndio gari” mentality.
Forester (Best Performance if it’s STI or XT) is equally a good car but if you get it, be prepared to fund its drinking habits. Also, you’re better off going for the XT or STi versions of it which don’t come cheap. Like RAV4, its naturally-aspirated version is relatively slow-off-the-blocks. But the car (Forester) is expensive to maintain also. Go for its Turbo version is you’re looking for good overtaking speed and cornering abilities. Avoid the naturally-aspirated (non-turbo) ones better get a CX-5 instead.
The CX-5 (Best for Budget Buyers) is a good car. However, much as it picks fast, it’s less reliable when it’s raining or when driven on loose chirpings or snow for that matter. It’s not as powerful as Forester (XT & STI) and RAV4 uphill unless you flip the “Sport” mode button. That said, it’s the cheapest SUV on this list and has the best interior so far. Its ground clearance is 1.2 inches lower than RAV4 and Forester’s so might not impress in demanding situations, though not poor. Go for it if you’re on a tight budget and don’t mind its low re-sale value.
Lastly, Honda CRV (Best Boot Capacity) seems overpriced to us given its specs. It has the largest boot space in our list so far. Good consumption. Good picking. However, it feels quite light and less stable (than RAV4 & Forester) at fast speeds especially on poorly done roads and ones with loose chirpings. Please note that this sentence is comparative…it does not mean that Honda CRV is a terribly unstable car…but compared to RAV4 & Forester, it feels less stable than the competition in rugged roads which are quite common in Kenya.