As we head to the re-run of the election 2017 i cant help but have a lot of lingering questions on my mind.Both the internal and the external observers apparently summarised the whole process on august 8 as free and fair bt the supreme court judged otherwise of course presumerbly accoding to the evidence provided there of.so as my question goes:-
Should the observers be vetted
Or maybe they judged the book by the cover,so should they be allowed to acces the servers so that they can give a conclusive observation of the process.
Should the observers be vetted
Or maybe they judged the book by the cover,so should they be allowed to acces the servers so that they can give a conclusive observation of the process.