I fully support this: the total number of MCAs in Kenya should be reduced by half. This is according to a recommendation by a team mandated to review the effects of the constitution on public finances. How I wish this recommendation can be adopted.
I never knew that in Kenya we’ve got a whole bunch of 774 nominated MCAs in order to fulfil the requirements of that nonsensical two-third gender principle. 774 nominated ‘mini-pigs’ just sitting down, doing nothing!! Of course I suspect most of these nominated MCAs are women. My question is: how are women on the ground benefiting from these so called nominated councillors?
Just cut down those MCAs to half and forget about this nonsense called gender rule. How can the so called two-third principle work when it comes to elective positions? Unless, of course, they designate some constituencies and counties that should be led exclusively by women.
Women should understand this: the so called nominated officials who are purportedly fighting for your ‘rights’ are nothing more than buccaneers riding on the waves of gender equality in order to satiate their own greed. We’ve got so many constituencies that have been led by women. Go into those constituencies and tell me how women have gained by having one of their own as an MP.
Can any man here tell me how he has ever gained just because he is represented by a male MP?
Can any man here tell me how he got a job just because he was male?
And how comes women claim they are equal, or even better, than men yet they want to have preferential treatment?
If you claim that you’re a better fighter than Mayweather, stop demanding that he fights you with only one hand!
If women have better brains than men(as they are claiming nowadays) they should stop demanding special preferences.
I must thank the first lady because she seems not to be very keen about this gender equality BS. I wonder the kind of sludge we would have to stomach if we had a first lady whose background is rich with these gender equality facades.
I never knew that in Kenya we’ve got a whole bunch of 774 nominated MCAs in order to fulfil the requirements of that nonsensical two-third gender principle. 774 nominated ‘mini-pigs’ just sitting down, doing nothing!! Of course I suspect most of these nominated MCAs are women. My question is: how are women on the ground benefiting from these so called nominated councillors?
Just cut down those MCAs to half and forget about this nonsense called gender rule. How can the so called two-third principle work when it comes to elective positions? Unless, of course, they designate some constituencies and counties that should be led exclusively by women.
Women should understand this: the so called nominated officials who are purportedly fighting for your ‘rights’ are nothing more than buccaneers riding on the waves of gender equality in order to satiate their own greed. We’ve got so many constituencies that have been led by women. Go into those constituencies and tell me how women have gained by having one of their own as an MP.
Can any man here tell me how he has ever gained just because he is represented by a male MP?
Can any man here tell me how he got a job just because he was male?
And how comes women claim they are equal, or even better, than men yet they want to have preferential treatment?
If you claim that you’re a better fighter than Mayweather, stop demanding that he fights you with only one hand!
If women have better brains than men(as they are claiming nowadays) they should stop demanding special preferences.
I must thank the first lady because she seems not to be very keen about this gender equality BS. I wonder the kind of sludge we would have to stomach if we had a first lady whose background is rich with these gender equality facades.
