1. Jubilee won 54-60% of all seats being contested ie MCA, MP, Women Rep, senators and governors. How can any one logically argue that Uhuru did not win presidential vote?
2. It appears that there was infiltration by soros-sponsored ngos whereby they used specific returning officers and presiding officers to deliberately sabotage the election by refusing to sign documents or otherwise by mishandling documents after voting and tallying of results so they could be nullified. NIS and CID wafanye kazi yao. Inaonekana kuna NGOs kadhaa zinatumiwa kupiganisha watu.
3. As regards the supreme court ruling, I wouldn’t blame the judges, although I think they should have let the results stand and issue guidelines about future IEBC conduct. But it appears to me the judges could have been persuaded to nullify the results because of 2 things.
- When they asked IEBC counsel about the problems with the documents, the lawyers did not give any reasons. How can a lawyer do that?
-They wanted to show ‘integrity and independence of the court’, and regardless of the fact the problem was only with transmission of results rather than with the voting and counting, and if Kenya will lose 200 Billion as a result, that is not their problem. Already NSE has lost close to 100 Billion since Friday. In that regard, I would term the judges naive, rather than malicious.
Finally, there’s no doubt that Uhuruto will win the rerun, and most likely by a bigger margin. Was the supreme court ruling really necessary then? I see a positive and negative effect courtesy of the SC ruling:
Positive: Supreme court is independent and therefore no need for anyone including Japuonj wuod Otoyo to call for demos (actually riots) whenever he feels aggrieved.
Negative: Billions lost, slowed economy, 2 more months of political tension, neighbouring countries that depend on Kenya’s port also tense for 2 more months…
2. It appears that there was infiltration by soros-sponsored ngos whereby they used specific returning officers and presiding officers to deliberately sabotage the election by refusing to sign documents or otherwise by mishandling documents after voting and tallying of results so they could be nullified. NIS and CID wafanye kazi yao. Inaonekana kuna NGOs kadhaa zinatumiwa kupiganisha watu.
3. As regards the supreme court ruling, I wouldn’t blame the judges, although I think they should have let the results stand and issue guidelines about future IEBC conduct. But it appears to me the judges could have been persuaded to nullify the results because of 2 things.
- When they asked IEBC counsel about the problems with the documents, the lawyers did not give any reasons. How can a lawyer do that?
-They wanted to show ‘integrity and independence of the court’, and regardless of the fact the problem was only with transmission of results rather than with the voting and counting, and if Kenya will lose 200 Billion as a result, that is not their problem. Already NSE has lost close to 100 Billion since Friday. In that regard, I would term the judges naive, rather than malicious.
Finally, there’s no doubt that Uhuruto will win the rerun, and most likely by a bigger margin. Was the supreme court ruling really necessary then? I see a positive and negative effect courtesy of the SC ruling:
Positive: Supreme court is independent and therefore no need for anyone including Japuonj wuod Otoyo to call for demos (actually riots) whenever he feels aggrieved.
Negative: Billions lost, slowed economy, 2 more months of political tension, neighbouring countries that depend on Kenya’s port also tense for 2 more months…
