The U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island.

Play Now
Access the Best Video
movfan

Ad closed by
Report this adWhy this ad?
Not interested in this ad
Seen this ad multiple times
Ad was inappropriate
Ad covered content
We’ll try not to show that ad again
Ad closed by

At 6:45 a.m. on March 1, 1954, the blue sky stretching over the central Pacific Ocean was split open by an enormous red flash.

Within seconds, a mushroom cloud towered 4½ miles high over Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. The explosion, the U.S. government’s first weaponized hydrogen bomb, was 1,000 times as powerful as the “Little Boy” atomic bomb blast that flattened Hiroshima — and a complete miscalculation.

Scientists had underestimated the size of what became known as the “Castle Bravo” test, resulting in an explosion that was 2½ times larger than expected. Radioactive ash dropped more than 7,000 square miles from the bomb site, caking the nearby inhabited islands.

“Within hours, the atoll was covered with a fine, white, powder-like substance,” the Marshall Islands health minister would later testify, according to the Atomic Heritage Foundation. “No one knew it was radioactive fallout. The children played in the ‘snow.’ They ate it.”

The 1954 explosion was part of nuclear tests conducted as the American military lurched into the nuclear age. From 1946 to 1958, 67 U.S. nuclear tests pulverized the tranquil reefs and islands of the central Pacific. International pressure finally halted the tests, but the damage was done — and continues to this day.

That was the message reiterated by U.N. Secretary General António Guterres on a recent tour of Pacific islands to discuss climate change. In Fiji on Thursday, he told a crowd about the huge “kind of coffin” built by the United States in the Marshall Islands to house the deadly radioactive debris from the 1980s. The structure, however, was never meant to last. Today, due to disrepair and rising sea tides, it is dangerously vulnerable. A strong storm could breach the dome, releasing the deadly legacy of America’s nuclear might.
“I’ve just been with the president of the Marshall Islands [Hilda Heine], who is very worried because there is a risk of leaking of radioactive materials that are contained in a kind of coffin in the area,” Guterres said in Fiji, Agence France-Presse reported.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/autMHvj3exA/sddefault.jpg#404_is_fine
Guterres’s “coffin” was the product of a belated American response to the testing of the 1940s and 1950s. Beginning in 1977, the Defense Nuclear Agency began a sustained cleanup of the nuclear debris left over on Enewetak Atoll, a slender ring of coral islands in the Marshall Islands’ northwestern corner.

Enewetak Atoll was subjected to repeated blasts during the testing, and inhabitants were forced to relocate before the explosions began. Beginning in 1977, 4,000 U.S. service members began collecting an estimated 73,000 cubic meters (2.58 million cubic feet) of tainted surface soil across the islands, according to the Marshall Islands’ government.

The material was then transported to Runit Island, where a 328-foot crater remained from a May 1958 test explosion. For three years, the American military dumped the material into the crater. Six men reportedly died during the work. Locals took to calling it “The Tomb,” the Guardian reported.

In 1980, a massive concrete dome — 18 inches thick and shaped like a flying saucer — was placed over the fallout debris, sealing off the material on Runit. But the $218 million project was only supposed to be temporary until a more permanent site was developed, according to the Guardian. However, no further plans were ever hatched.

In 1983, the Marshall Islands signed a compact of free association with the United States, granting the island nation the right to govern itself. But the deal also settled “all claims, past, present and future” tied to the nuclear testing and left the dome in the care of the island government

They can never be development without pollution. The two are mutually inclusive. The more you develop, the more you pollute the environment and produce more waste.

New York was literally built on garbage they didn’t know how to dipose off.Do your research on garbage landfills or nat geo pia had a nice feature. nothing big about it.

I saw that Doccie on Aljazeera

Enyewe the usa has a special place in hell next to Hitler and others. How do you explode a hydrogen bomb that is 1000 times more powerful knowing another Island nation with inhabitants are within the radioactive fallout zone. Kwani those people were considered not human but ants. Then after that mess you build a waste disposal plant to store your nuclear waste in the same place. It has outlasted its service years and you still ignore it. Ile majini wazungu walichukuwa north America must be the devil himself. They have been on a role of genocide and conflict ever since.

What does this mean? I know what you meant to say but there’s nothing like “mutually inclusive” (if there were, there’d be one entity).

But to the point above, if the pollution is greater than the development benefits, would it be worth it? Would you stab yourself in the heart to see if you can bleed?

What a nonsensical notion. It looks like a fiat to destroy the earth for ‘development’ and a perfect excuse for countries like the USA to deny climate change or sign treaties they participated in drafting.

These are the most polluted countries of the world:

https://www.conserve-energy-future.com/top-most-polluted-countries-world.php

By your argument, they also ought to be the most developed.

But, 3rd world countries are polluting their own environment without much development.
The challenge we have is to increase the ratio of development to that of pollution.