There was no hacking, says French firm.

#4
Timid. Thats what Kentans are.

Ngunjiri,I do not know whether to filify or celebrate him.
Worst thing happening? They are busy jystifying the end.
 
Last edited:

Mr Black

Village Elder
#8
How did the judges decide the transmission system was compromised if there was no variance cited in the results streamed on the portal and those on the form 34As? Their primary concern should have been the accuracy of the results and they must show in their judgment that the results were inaccurate.

On hacking or manipulation of the system, I hope they were alive to the fact that anyone could do that including the opposition, they might have been duped into a flawed decision.
 

Simiyu22

Village Elder
#13
How did the judges decide the transmission system was compromised if there was no variance cited in the results streamed on the portal and those on the form 34As? Their primary concern should have been the accuracy of the results and they must show in their judgment that the results were inaccurate.

On hacking or manipulation of the system, I hope they were alive to the fact that anyone could do that including the opposition, they might have been duped into a flawed decision.
The judges looked at the overall integrity of the system not piecemeal. That's what the constitution demands of them. A lot of arguments, on both sides, are claims here and there. Nobody duped the judges, if you start having doubts about the whole process, even if just certain aspects, then the whole process is flawed. Otherwise , the judiciary is just a rubberstamp. Just like most institutions.
 

Hunter Xp

Village Elder
#14
All These robots sing the same tune you wonder how they are programmed. transmission was just part of the problem, iebc admitted their system was compromised when they declared the numbers on our screens "statistics" . You robots conveniently forget the damning revelations that 10000 polling stations results didn't have form 34As and 600 didn't transmit results all together... you also forget that it was proven in court that ballot stuffing happened for presidential votes.
 
#16
All These robots sing the same tune you wonder how they are programmed. transmission was just part of the problem, iebc admitted their system was compromised when they declared the numbers on our screens "statistics" . You robots conveniently forget the damning revelations that 10000 polling stations results didn't have form 34As and 600 didn't transmit results all together... you also forget that it was proven in court that ballot stuffing happened for presidential votes.
They used the word statistics since the court had ruled against using the word provisional..
 
#18
All These robots sing the same tune you wonder how they are programmed. transmission was just part of the problem, iebc admitted their system was compromised when they declared the numbers on our screens "statistics" . You robots conveniently forget the damning revelations that 10000 polling stations results didn't have form 34As and 600 didn't transmit results all together... you also forget that it was proven in court that ballot stuffing happened for presidential votes.
Jesus Christ at least use facts..how can 10,000 polling stations miss those forms that is basically saying almost all polling stations didn't have the forms..

Object of contention was that 10000 or so form 34a s had irregularities
 
#19
in short they put in unconfirmed numbers to drive a certain narrative ? wezi kabisa.
Well the NASA batallion would have also complained if there was nothing being displayed by the iebc..
To test the fairness of this elections just get a polling station which NASA can contest the numbers there and confirm they don't correspond to what their agents signed against..and check the extent of this error..apo ndo unajua NASA ilishidwa roho safi
 
Last edited:

Mr Black

Village Elder
#20
They used the word statistics since the court had ruled against using the word provisional..
Actually the Maina Kiai ruling stated the result declared at the polling station would be final, the problem is the ruling failed to consider that the result would be posted on the portal before it reaches the RO at the constitutlency who would verify it, before verification no one could confirm the result was accurate which is why they called them "statistics".
 

Top