WALE MAJAMAA WA CULT: ALL WOMEN ARE NOT LIKE THAT

#1
Me I dont even understand this red pills cult so for sure this is a copy paste. Dont shoot the messenger ,its not me who brainwashed you .LOL

In TRP there's this common concept named AWALT which roughly translates to "All women are like that". For example: "All women want the alfa and despise the beta" or "All women will cheat on you with a more alpha guy" or "All women are uncapable of love", and so on. The underlying logic being that it's "universal female nature" to be mindless, exploitative, manipulative and promiscuous with virtually no exception.

Now is this true? To answer this i'd like to quote Mark Manson, a former dating coach, who very elequently says that problems with dating can eventually be traced back to 2 problems: a) You're attracted to the wrong kind of people. For example, a girl who's attracted to money and good looks, and prioritizes it over warmth and kindness, may end up with a guy who's cute or rich but also a cheater or an asshole. and b) Your behavior attracts the wrong kind of people. For example, if you're dominant and agressive, you're gonna attract girls that like dominant and agressive guys.

In short, you attract what you are. And when it comes to science, this is very fucking true!

Consider this: Jeffrey A. Hall and Melanie Canterburry (2011) studied agressive pick up artist tactics like being competitive with other guys to get a girl, trying be alone with her at any costs and teasing or insulting women. What they found is that women who are very open to short term uncommited sex, and women who are sexist (ex.: those who think they are "willflowers" who need to be wined and dinned for sex or those who think that women should manipulate men in order to have access to their money) are the ones who find this strategies the most sexy.

Another study found that women who find highly dominant men attractive are also sensation-seekers (Giebel, 2015). In particular, women who like wild parties, drinking and short term sex, or women who are just very prone to boredom overall (ex.: Not liking to be at home, always having the need to be stimulated with something) find dominance very attractive. Sensation-seeking women tend to have a "Ludic Love" style. Ludic Love is defined as less commited, playful type of love, where the partner is kept guessing about the status of the current relationship. Ludic lovers are less interested in commitment, often cheat and like to play "mind games" in their courtship and view courtship and relationships as a game (Roberti, 2004).

Again Giebel (2015) also found that anxious women who are also experience seekers like bad boys. The reason? They need to feel safe and think that a dominant man provides that safety in their daily lifes.

Isenberg(1991) also found that women who are attracted to extreme male dominance like the ones who are in love with murderers in prison, are usually sensation-seekers and survived abuse, like an abusive partner or childhood.

And Simpson and Gangestad (2003) found that women who are very interested in short term uncommited sex will prefer good looking or high social status jerks (and actually chose these men as boyfriends, although their relationships usually don't last long, obviously) .

I could go on, and on, and on, but the point is this: The kind of tactics that the Red Pill advises, and their whole philosophy, is aimed to work and attract women who are promiscuous, don't care about commitment, have daddy issues, are sexist and think that men should pay for dates, that play mind games, like to drink a lot and think that life is all about "live fast, die young". Given that TRP actually hates this kind of women but their behavior mainly works on them, it preety much becomes a never endless vicious cycle of clusterfuck: TRPers will attract uncompatible women, get fucked over, complain in online forums, rinse and repeat.

To conclude: NO, NOT ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT. IT'S THE KIND THAT YOU GET ALONG WITH THAT IS LIKE THAT.
 

Delus

Village Elder
#4
Napenda Mark Manson pia been following him since 2013. He makes a lot of sense. I have nothing against redpill but they have too many ideas that are beyond my comprehension.
 

Tom Bayeye

Village Chief
#9
Me I dont even understand this red pills cult so for sure this is a copy paste. Dont shoot the messenger ,its not me who brainwashed you .LOL

In TRP there's this common concept named AWALT which roughly translates to "All women are like that". For example: "All women want the alfa and despise the beta" or "All women will cheat on you with a more alpha guy" or "All women are uncapable of love", and so on. The underlying logic being that it's "universal female nature" to be mindless, exploitative, manipulative and promiscuous with virtually no exception.

Now is this true? To answer this i'd like to quote Mark Manson, a former dating coach, who very elequently says that problems with dating can eventually be traced back to 2 problems: a) You're attracted to the wrong kind of people. For example, a girl who's attracted to money and good looks, and prioritizes it over warmth and kindness, may end up with a guy who's cute or rich but also a cheater or an asshole. and b) Your behavior attracts the wrong kind of people. For example, if you're dominant and agressive, you're gonna attract girls that like dominant and agressive guys.

In short, you attract what you are. And when it comes to science, this is very fucking true!

Consider this: Jeffrey A. Hall and Melanie Canterburry (2011) studied agressive pick up artist tactics like being competitive with other guys to get a girl, trying be alone with her at any costs and teasing or insulting women. What they found is that women who are very open to short term uncommited sex, and women who are sexist (ex.: those who think they are "willflowers" who need to be wined and dinned for sex or those who think that women should manipulate men in order to have access to their money) are the ones who find this strategies the most sexy.

Another study found that women who find highly dominant men attractive are also sensation-seekers (Giebel, 2015). In particular, women who like wild parties, drinking and short term sex, or women who are just very prone to boredom overall (ex.: Not liking to be at home, always having the need to be stimulated with something) find dominance very attractive. Sensation-seeking women tend to have a "Ludic Love" style. Ludic Love is defined as less commited, playful type of love, where the partner is kept guessing about the status of the current relationship. Ludic lovers are less interested in commitment, often cheat and like to play "mind games" in their courtship and view courtship and relationships as a game (Roberti, 2004).

Again Giebel (2015) also found that anxious women who are also experience seekers like bad boys. The reason? They need to feel safe and think that a dominant man provides that safety in their daily lifes.

Isenberg(1991) also found that women who are attracted to extreme male dominance like the ones who are in love with murderers in prison, are usually sensation-seekers and survived abuse, like an abusive partner or childhood.

And Simpson and Gangestad (2003) found that women who are very interested in short term uncommited sex will prefer good looking or high social status jerks (and actually chose these men as boyfriends, although their relationships usually don't last long, obviously) .

I could go on, and on, and on, but the point is this: The kind of tactics that the Red Pill advises, and their whole philosophy, is aimed to work and attract women who are promiscuous, don't care about commitment, have daddy issues, are sexist and think that men should pay for dates, that play mind games, like to drink a lot and think that life is all about "live fast, die young". Given that TRP actually hates this kind of women but their behavior mainly works on them, it preety much becomes a never endless vicious cycle of clusterfuck: TRPers will attract uncompatible women, get fucked over, complain in online forums, rinse and repeat.

To conclude: NO, NOT ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT. IT'S THE KIND THAT YOU GET ALONG WITH THAT IS LIKE THAT.
 
#13
whats worse me I or being in a cult, toka cult kwanza ndio unifunze grammar
you are using the word 'cult' harpharzadly,do you know what it even means
cult manenos. the sheep is the symbol of all red pill cult members
i thought sheep was symbolism of jesus ,but what do i know,i'm not that into religion,remember that dude that wanted to dispatch his toi in the bible coz he was told to, then a sheep(ram)appeared out of nowhere? you are mistaking it with a goat,that up there is a merino sheep dada
 
#16
Yep man! You did. Red pill is a drug used to cut the little head's distractions in a man's life.
is this crap from the matrix movie? i believe in free will you choose the bed you want to lie in or something to that effect,hakuna mambo na distraction kama ulikua raised na hitler ama kim jong Un for parents, you know whats good or whats going to fcuk you up at the end of the day, peer pressure is bullshiet ,man is weak you just have to know the diference between shit and choose wisely
 

Alchemist

Village Sponsor
#17
is this crap from the matrix movie? i believe in free will you choose the bed you want to lie in or something to that effect,hakuna mambo na distraction kama ulikua raised na hitler ama kim jong Un for parents, you know whats good or whats going to fcuk you up at the end of the day, peer pressure is bullshiet ,man is weak you just have to know the diference between shit and choose wisely
Ulitaka nikuandikie paragraphs? Hiyo ni kazi ya Makena.
 

Top