Wendy Waeni exposed

No. A manager is obligated to adhere to the terms of contract drawn between him and his client. You cannot impose demands on him outside that contract.
Did the said contract give him veto powers to release near ponographic content about a minor? Guys, even if he would have been accused of advancing for nether areas of the kid, he should only have released that info in court in a controlled environment, unfortunately he wasn't even threatened with the same, he is chasing winds.

In his defence, he should have stated how the new managers are failing Wendy, as a manager it was his obligation to protect Wendy's private life and offer any assistance if he could in secrecy. This man has failed all men in this group. The girls privacy has been defiled forever intentionally or unintentionally.

What he did and what a doctors does is no different, they handle client very private info and are bound by law not to share to third parties unless otherwise demanded.

What was so hard in obtaining financial transcripts either from Bank or Mpesa? Money trail is what would have saved his character unless his work ethic/sexuality was questionable and a right to reply was asked. Quoting and thanking chipukeezy ni ufala tupu, he won't help him for his misadventures.
 
Did the said contract give him veto powers to release near ponographic content about a minor? Guys, even if he would have been accused of advancing for nether areas of the kid, he should only have released that info in court in a controlled environment, unfortunately he wasn't even threatened with the same, he is chasing winds.

In his defence, he should have stated how the new managers are failing Wendy, as a manager it was his obligation to protect Wendy's private life and offer any assistance if he could in secrecy. This man has failed all men in this group. The girls privacy has been defiled forever intentionally or unintentionally.

What he did and what a doctors does is no different, they handle client very private info and are bound by law not to share to third parties unless otherwise demanded.

What was so hard in obtaining financial transcripts either from Bank or Mpesa? Money trail is what would have saved his character unless his work ethic/sexuality was questionable and a right to reply was asked. Quoting and thanking chipukeezy ni ufala tupu, he won't help him for his misadventures.
A lot of nonsense. I don't think he should have released the images, but that is what the girl chose. He chose to make PUBLIC statements about him. Why should the man be forced to prove his innocence? Let the girl prove her claims. What kind of nonsense is this?
 
Did the said contract give him veto powers to release near ponographic content about a minor? Guys, even if he would have been accused of advancing for nether areas of the kid, he should only have released that info in court in a controlled environment, unfortunately he wasn't even threatened with the same, he is chasing winds.

In his defence, he should have stated how the new managers are failing Wendy, as a manager it was his obligation to protect Wendy's private life and offer any assistance if he could in secrecy. This man has failed all men in this group. The girls privacy has been defiled forever intentionally or unintentionally.

What he did and what a doctors does is no different, they handle client very private info and are bound by law not to share to third parties unless otherwise demanded.

What was so hard in obtaining financial transcripts either from Bank or Mpesa? Money trail is what would have saved his character unless his work ethic/sexuality was questionable and a right to reply was asked. Quoting and thanking chipukeezy ni ufala tupu, he won't help him for his misadventures.
No. But that is him. What I am telling you is that we in here are irrelevant as far as directing what he can and cannot release. A signed contract could obligate him...

A "child" with a gun will kill you. Shoot back before you they shoot you down.

>>>Doctors and lawyers do not sign confidentiality agreements with you. Their code of ethics demands it, and if they breach it, it is not even the client who will get them, it is peer audit that will skin the doc/counsel.
 
Last edited:
No. But that is him. What I am telling you is that we in here are irrelevant as far as directing what he can and cannot release. A signed contract could obligate him...

>>>Doctors and lawyers do not sign confidentiality agreements with you. Their code of ethics demands it, and if they breach it, it is not even the client who will get them, it is peer audit that will skin the doc/counsel.
See him in court soon being fried in his own mess. And yes, you get my point about confidentiality, he is dealing with a minor not an adult so he can't go speaking without some mouth governor. Jamaa hajipendi
 

magreb

Village Elder
See him in court soon being fried in his own mess. And yes, you get my point about confidentiality, he is dealing with a minor not an adult so he can't go speaking without some mouth governor. Jamaa hajipendi
You just typed a lot of useless rubbish. Wacha tungoje the next move. Why you want to shift the burden of proof to our boy is beyond me. So Wendy and company are free to make wild claims in public but our boy isn't allowed to make single wild claim in public? There are no rules in this game. You kill me before I kill you is the only rule.
 
A minor with xvideo account? Do you even have one yourself?

The law is an ass, he will regret publishing the nonsense he did, more so he states he was the manager. That info was not meant for public consumption but would have helped inside the litigation process as he states he was the manager.

Second, the burger confisticated the phone, how sure are you he wasn't consuming the content or did it to scam the kid in future with threats? I don't know what charter in his contract allowed him to spy on the kid without express authority from the guardians though and even if it's quoted somewhere allow the info gathered on a public forum. Yeye si Sonko and even the latter is clever enough not to shame kids.

I repeat, this guy's goose is cooked, see it as you may but he failed miserably. I don't own an xvideo account, but a child's image must be protected from all savages.
 
You just typed a lot of useless rubbish. Wacha tungoje the next move. Why you want to shift the burden of proof to our boy is beyond me. So Wendy and company are free to make wild claims in public but our boy isn't allowed to make single wild claim in public? There are no rules in this game. You kill me before I kill you is the only rule.
Yeah, within reasonable margin, whoever advised boychild to introduce porn angle in the pic ni ghaseer sana, might cause this dude his entire career and youthful life. His only right of reply was STAY PROFESSIONAL.
 
Yeah, within reasonable margin, whoever advised boychild to introduce porn angle in the pic ni ghaseer sana, might cause this dude his entire career and youthful life. His only right of reply was STAY PROFESSIONAL.
The social media is a court. That child knows that. She went on the media to kill the guy there. He responded in kind, something which apparently worked because the two harlots withdrew.
 
The social media is a court. That child knows that. She went on the media to kill the guy there. He responded in kind, something which apparently worked because the two harlots withdrew.

True, but in the courts of social justice always remember the weaker sex has right of way most of the time. This one just came in double portions, a child and a girl with "what ifs" attached.

The two mongrels aren't far behind, they are coming back with a vengence and with a plethora of all broken laws subject to a kid they can lay hands on and armed to boot with an apt legal counsel. that am sure. Looking back, was it really wise, was it worth it? I doubt boychild evidence is even admissible in court to begin with cause modes of accessing the materials is suspect and shrouded in so much obfuscation in manner of device handling by him.

See the issue now has evolved from financial issues to child mismanagement literally on several levels. A good lawyer will finish boychild before 1pm and the Courts will just say "Guilty". Was it worth the drama confronting the ladies? Yes, but differently.
 

Commonsense

Senior Villager
The girls browser history and chat history (if they were her's at all) hazikufaa kuingilia hapa.

Instead angepost payment history, then a sue Mama, JK and anyone famous mwenye ameongea.

Posting the former screenshots (*irrelevant* info at that time) inamfanya akae guilty, emotional na evasive.

Sasa, ameconfuse issues kwa general public (fraud case na porn/experimentation nonsense) but ameonyesha he's definitely guilty of kuiba pesa ya mtoto.
 
The girls browser history and chat history (if they were her's at all) hazikufaa kuingilia hapa.

Instead angepost payment history, then a sue Mama, JK and anyone famous mwenye ameongea.

Posting the former screenshots (*irrelevant* info at that time) inamfanya akae guilty, emotional na evasive.

Sasa, ameconfuse issues kwa general public (fraud case na porn/experimentation nonsense) but ameonyesha he's definitely guilty of kuiba pesa ya mtoto.
Wendy's mum said she was receiving money from the manager. So who is fooling who?
 
Ni kama nikuaccuse ya kuiba simu yangu kwa bank, then badala ya kutoa cctv evidence. wewe unatoa video yangu nikivuta bhangi useme ona huyu huvuta bangi.

Its just not relevant to the situation, unless unajaribu kudistract watu.
Unfortunately that is how you have to do it when cofronting a smear campaign online.
 
Wendy's mum said she was receiving money from the manager. So who is fooling who?
The reason am against this fella is exposing alleged private life of a minor for public consumption. He is the manager and should be able to handle the heat the docket demands, and mark you a minor is involved hence has greater equal rights to him considering what he posted irregardless of Wendy's opinion in whichever forum. This behavior of his points to a guilty fella using guerrilla diversionary tactics.

To issue at hand, some money doesnt mean Rightful amount, Joe's only needed to prove there was nothing sinister but clever guy thought he better take a swipe or two while at it.
 
Last edited:
The reason am against this fella is exposing alleged private life of a minor for public consumption. He is the manager and should be able to handle the heat the docket demands, and mark you a minor is involved hence has greater equal rights to him considering what he posted irregardless of Wendy's opinion in whichever forum. This behavior of his points to a guilty fella using guerrilla diversionary tactics.

To issue at hand, some money doesnt mean Rightful amount, Joe's only needed to prove there was nothing sinister but clever guy thought he better take a swipe or two while at it.
Where do you get the idea that a child has got greater rights than him? Since when did the accused need to prove his innocence? The person making the accusations needs to prove his guilt. Yeye alisema she has never received a penny. Remake akasema hajawahi kupewa anything because hii no promotion. So who is lying?
 
Mimi nataka tu kuuliza swali moja?
WHERE IS @TrumanCapote ? Where at though o @TrumanCapote ?????
Halooooooo…………
Jana nili
Mimi nataka tu kuuliza swali moja?
WHERE IS @TrumanCapote ? Where at though o @TrumanCapote ?????
Halooooooo…………
Yaaassss!!! I was away. So this is my position on this matter. This man Joe Mwangi is just trying to divert attention from the fact that alikula ganji ya huyu mrembo.

He is not her father to be concerned with her phone or her sexuality . He overstepped by taking the phone and furthermore we cannot ascertain the voracity of the screen shots coz we know he had created fake social media accounts in her name.
 
Last edited:

Top