I'll try to be objective as much as I can.
1. The law is that before making a judgement, the judge examines the Issues, the Rules governing those issues, the Analysis of the issues versus the facts and then makes a Conclusion.
2. In the case of the Supreme Court, the majority judges did not outline the reasoning behind their judgement. Not even a summary stating that IEBC broke rules X and Y and for that reason, the only possible consequence was nullification.
3. Given that 2 did not happen, we should ask whether 1 happened.
4. Assuming that the majority judges had concrete reasons to nullify the elections, why did they need 21 days to write the full ruling? Didn't they have solid reasons before arriving at their decision?
5. Assuming that they had valid reasons, why didn't no. 2 happen?
6. Assuming that the majority judges had concrete reasons, will the IEBC be in a position to avoid the same mistakes given that they have to wait for 21 days to find out what their mistake is? That leaves them with 39 days to rectify their mistakes if any.
7. If it takes 21 days to write a judgement, what time should it take to prepare and conduct a nationwide election. 39 days?
8. Assuming that another election is held but because of time constraints another technical challenge happens on the part of IEBC, then what happens? Another election?
9. If an election is not about numbers, then what is it about?
1. The law is that before making a judgement, the judge examines the Issues, the Rules governing those issues, the Analysis of the issues versus the facts and then makes a Conclusion.
2. In the case of the Supreme Court, the majority judges did not outline the reasoning behind their judgement. Not even a summary stating that IEBC broke rules X and Y and for that reason, the only possible consequence was nullification.
3. Given that 2 did not happen, we should ask whether 1 happened.
4. Assuming that the majority judges had concrete reasons to nullify the elections, why did they need 21 days to write the full ruling? Didn't they have solid reasons before arriving at their decision?
5. Assuming that they had valid reasons, why didn't no. 2 happen?
6. Assuming that the majority judges had concrete reasons, will the IEBC be in a position to avoid the same mistakes given that they have to wait for 21 days to find out what their mistake is? That leaves them with 39 days to rectify their mistakes if any.
7. If it takes 21 days to write a judgement, what time should it take to prepare and conduct a nationwide election. 39 days?
8. Assuming that another election is held but because of time constraints another technical challenge happens on the part of IEBC, then what happens? Another election?
9. If an election is not about numbers, then what is it about?