So far my conclusion is that naturally light skinned people in Kenya are a product of Arab and European ancestry, or even ancient Chinese like that Kenyan girl from the coast who was in the news years back.
I just need an affirmation. Whatever I choose to do with this information is upto myself.
U
DNA variation of Black people is the most varied.So probably they are pure Africans.
M
The original negro genes produced totally black people but as foreigners started mingling with our people, production of light skinned people was inevitable. It needs no explanation
there ancestors whored
original africans are bantu and they are brown and generally less pigmented. there is this other population of immigrant Yemeni freaks on the east coast and the dark people of sudanese origin around the nile and its sources. sudan is a slave state of Egypt, historically.
But still Bantu were originally dark skinned
Fuck Bantu.
Nope
Intermarriages between coastal swahilis and Maasai plus kikuyus.
Nonsense
bow if you cannot kneel.
umafwi thread
No.
Khoi Khoi and San are pure Africans. They have the oldest dna in the world and they are light skin. So probably not. Africa has the most genetic diversity in the world.
Kibaki’s death has reminded me his genes may have not been polluted by the white man in central. The kind of blackness an original bantu would possess.
Si walitoka TZ’s coast originally?
Why weren’t your tribesmen brave enough to say that as bantus all over Africa displaced other tribes from every fertile land, wherever they migrated to?
Research has shown that Khoisan are related to Asian communities and not to negroes
(Phys.org) —A team of researchers with representatives from the U.S., Germany and France has found evidence of western Eurasian genes in Khoisan tribes living in southern Africa. This suggests, the researchers conclude in a paper they’ve had published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that a migration from the Middle East back to Africa occurred approximately 3000 years ago.
Scientists believe humans evolved from ancestral primates in Africa several hundred thousand years ago, but it wasn’t until approximately 65,000 years ago that they made their way out of Africa and into the Middle East and eventually the rest of the world. Until recently, that migration has been viewed by most scientists as a one-way trip. Gene studies over the past several years has turned that thinking around, however, as its been found that many people in several parts of Africa have European or Asian gene segments in their DNA. In this latest study, the researchers have found evidence of Eurasian genes in tribespeople who were thought to have a purely African ancestry.
The Khoisan tribespeople of today still live much as their ancestors did—they are hunter-gathers who are also pastoralists—they are most familiar to westerners as the people who speak with distinctive clicking noises. Until now, they were believed to have the purest African gene pool due to their thousands of years of isolationist practices.
The team acquired DNA samples from 32 people living in Khoisan tribes in southern Africa—an analysis revealed Eurasian gene segments in all of them. But that wasn’t the end of the story. To understand how the gene fragments got into the Khoisan tribespeople, the researchers turned to archeological and linguistic evidence to build a possible time-line of events. In so doing, they’ve found what they believe to have been a migration back into Africa by people of the Middle East (ancestors of the people that migrated to Europe and Asia) approximately 3000 years ago. Those people made their way to various parts of the continent, including a part of eastern Africa from which the Khoisan tribespeople had migrated south approximately 900 and 1800 years ago.
The researchers found something else—the Khoisan tribespeople also had snippets of Neanderthal DNA in their genes as well—courtesy of their Eurasian heritage.