Vile Nyakundi alisema, if you are seriously considering marriage… the 20-24 age bracket ndio goldmine… past 25 ni mabakisho… Kuna villager alisema females do not understand the concept of time, hawajui wakichapa; ndio maana wakifika 28 wanaanza hizi unrealistic demands… “God-fearing and financially stable” man ni euphemism ya loser man/beta man…
:D:D:D:D You can’t relate to something you have no experience in and I won’t educate you.
Here is the empirically supported answer
Psychologists designed a model requiring participants to evaluate each result in order to strategize the next choice, more like decision making in the real world.
The results: The older decision makers trounced their juniors. The findings will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
“We found that older adults are better at evaluating the immediate and delayed benefits of each option they choose from. They are better at creating strategies in response to the environment,” says Darrell Worthy, of Texas A&M University, who conducted the study with Marissa Gorlick, Jennifer Pacheco, David Schnyer, and Todd Maddox, all at the University of Texas at Austin.
Ofcourse no one can argue with Nyakundi, he’s a paragon of wisdom. If women are delusional then in which world is a man who is God fearing(euphemism for disciplined and self controlled and settled- in other words not a playboy) and wealthy man euphemism for a loser? In a capitalistic society financial stability is the biggest sign of being an alpha man or woman, thats why its the poor brokeasses who must learn red pill philosophies inorder to use them to somewhat mimic the behaviour of wealthy men inorder to trick women psychologically into thinking theyre alpha men because naturally they lack what is needed to be an alpha which is money, they may also lack the physical alpha traits which women prefer when theyre younger when their decisionmaking isnt at its best. Even married women are known to gravitate towards men with below physical features when theyre ovulating. Most kids who dont belong to the father of the home are fathered by men who have these traits ,like gym instructors and youthful lanky men.
ALPHA MALE PHYSICAL FEATURES
Three physical characteristics associated with social dominance include:
Height. Being tall has a range of social benefits: Taller men demonstrate less sensitivity to cues of dominance in other men (e.g., masculinity), and show less jealousy toward socially and physically dominant rivals than shorter men do. Tall men are also perceived as more dominant than shorter men. Similarly, dominant men also “play larger,” as they are estimated to be taller than less-dominant men. Taken together, these results offer some explanation for the well-known association between height and social status. Tall men more often enjoy leadership roles, have higher starting salaries, and have greater overall income. And intelligence may not correct for this disparity: One study reported that full professors were .47 inches taller than associate professors, who were .26 inches taller than assistant professors, who were in turn 1.24 inches taller than the average nonacademic.
Height is also highly valued in the human matingmarket: Studies show that women favor tall men not just in controlled laboratory-based experiments, but in real-world contexts such as online dating advertisements and speed-dating events. Such men also garner more responses to online dating profiles; are more likely to get a date; and are more likely to be married. There’s a curious caveat, however—although height is linked to mate preferences in the West, studies have revealed that a desire for tall men is not a cross-cultural universal.
Voice. Having a deep voice has been referred to as “the Barry White Effect.” Studies show that a man’s voice communicates much more than spoken words: It’s also a signal of physical size, and, in turn, his potential ability to prevail in mano-a-mano combat. Likewise, men with low voices are perceived as older, taller, heavier, and more dominant. In other words, he could best a competitor in a brawl.
And as one might expect, men with euphonious voices show higher levels of mating success. In surveys of North Americans, men with low-pitched voices tallied more total sex partners, and among Hadza hunter-gatherers low voice pitch was related to having greater numbers of children. Further, those judged to have appealing voices also reported having sex earlier; more total sex partners; and more affairs. There may be a double meaning to the phrase “a smooth talker,” as research has found that women find attractive voices more difficult to resist.
Face. A handsome face also advertises a man’s dominance as well. A rugged visage is believed to signal optimally elevated levels of T to women in search of high-quality genes they can pass on to their children. While this masculinizing hormoneproduces these seductive features, it is thought that having too much of it is actually a burden on the immune system. So, the thinking goes, only men with strong immune systems can withstand T’s potent effects. And for our ancestors, a powerful immune system that could effectively fight off diseases had great evolutionary currency. Consistent with this argument, studies have shown that facial masculinity is related to higher levels of circulating T as well as perceived and actual levels of health.
The male face as a communicator of dominance has received particular interest from researchers. Scientists have even found an actual measurement to assess these attributes in men: the ratio of facial width to upper facial height (fWHR). This feature becomes pronounced with surges of T at puberty, and is associated with various features of dominance. For example, men with higher fWHRs have higher testosterone, and are comparatively more violent, exploitative, and wealthy. Along related lines, fWHR predicts self-perceived power and success. For example, CEOs with higher fWHRs demonstrate greater financial prowess, and military officers with more dominant visages earned higher ranks throughout their tenures. Moreover, men with wider faces are more formidable opponents: They are less likely to die from physical violence, suggesting they are either more ferocious fighters or even that their skulls are more resistant to injuries. This makes sense, too: Masculine features such as a chiseled jaw and heavy brow may have evolved to in order to sustain blows from a competitor—a broken jaw could have spelled death in the ancient world.
The irony is that the most physically dominant or alpha males are not the wealthiest males, so women who have money - alpha females prefer the physically alpha males - with the below looks, however because most women have no money so to settle down they have to get the ugly,short and rich guy - alpha male in capitalistic society its a trade off. However if opportunity comes , they will likely mate with the physically alpha male because this attraction is biological and evolutionary to propagate the survival of the species.[ATTACH=full]167417[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]167418[/ATTACH]
Nyongana tu hapo.
[ATTACH=full]167481[/ATTACH]
Thanks, but I think I’ll pass both offers anyway.