Lenaola Vs. Safaricom

even when it is a threat to the integrity of the nation? note they are called state SECURITY organs…

1 Like

Aaaai. This will lead to nowhere. Jubilee Government controlled State Organs bringing forth evidence that implicates a Judge who publicly ruled against Jubilee already makes that evidence inadmissible.

sigh do you really need things spelt out to you like a kid? If you can’t see any criminal activity here, you must be the fool that can’t see his ignorance. Art 238(1)- describes national security- national security is the protection against INTERNAL and external threats to Kenya’s territorial integrity and soverignity, its PEOPLE, their RIGHTS, freedoms, property, PEACE, STABILITY and prosperity and other national interests.

The conversations may provide the mens rea (intent) to interfere with national interests as enshrined in art10, contravene with principles of the judiciary in art.159 (In particular 159(2)(d)), interfere with independence of judiciary contrary to art160(1), commit treason and thus threaten the rights of Kenyans in particular the right to life, right to movement and residence, economic and social rights (art 26, 39, 43)…I can continue, but bottom line, these are high ranking people, in the Judiciary, and it is fair to properly investigate them if there are such claims…so yes, their right to privacy is overridden by national security concern and public policy. In any case art.24(d) allows for limitation of rights under Bill of Rights if enjoyment of that right by that individual is prejudicial to the rights of others- in this case, it’s 2 vs 45M…

9 Likes

You have already judged? Isorait.

oh, really? he is the victim now? remember we are talking about an experienced judge who knows fully well what he should and should not do; not an adventurous teenager…

3 Likes

have i now?

You’ve copied a lot of stuff to actually explain nothing. If there was any criminal culpability then we’d be speaking of something else now judging by Jubilee’s desperation.

Need to relate the two because your correlation above is bogus,treason charges in the hearing of an election petition facing the president? Are you really that dumb?

2 vs 45M ? Another makanga argument from a self-entitled Uthamaki online warrior. Article 24(d) has nothing to do with this. In no way can you possibly argue out that the judges while acting on the case infringe on the rights of Kenyans.

Thought national security threats ni vitu kama Al Shabaab recruitment, sharing sensitive information pertaining to our defence mechanisms and colluding to do damage on public coffers. This is more of a private convo. Its really sad that most people defend blindly a far reaching action in the name of defending our nation.

1 Like

My ‘caveat’ got you worked up? :D:D

1 Like

Man. These desperate idiots will clutch at anything just to console and convince their bitter selves that the upright Supreme Court judges are criminals just because their screwball said so. To them ruling against the president is a threat to national security. Fucking delusional dolts.

Wacha nicheke tu. You people only understand when Orengo/Raila says.

3 Likes

Yep! We’ve been trampled upon far too long. The meek shall not prevail in Soro’s filthy plot. Look at Ukraine today.

3 Likes

Are the allegations true ? We’d have to start from there.

You thrive and drown on propaganda and BS. Issa pite.

He appended his signature to the sick ruling, but his cowardice is legendary, similar to that of Wetang’ula. When the day came he got cold feet.

2 Likes

Please save yourself by doing some research.

1 Like

Am sorry my research wont find nothing to do with pulling someone’s personal call logs.

Nullification of an election on the basis of false documents and affidavits, and collusion between judges and petitioners, cost us more than Goldengate, ‘Eurobond’ and NYS combined. It tore into Wanjiku’s soul: freedom of choice.

How do you know what the conversation and messages were about?

6 Likes

That criminal has no reputation to damage. So now the only issue he is arguing with is how evidence of his crimes was acquired not that he committed a crime?

1 Like

why don’t we let things unfold…

1 Like