The Verdict

[Kasighau]

@mukuna

I hear strokes can be induced?

Hehehe. Wewe utakujiwa Na unmarked car

[system]

How much money is this rerun going to cost the Kenyan taxpayer of money we don’t have? All because of one man and his insatiable greed for power. It’s unconscionable to waste billions in a country where people are dying of hunger and nurses are on strike. The SC made a terrible mistake this time.

[system]

@4makind

it is virtually impossible to eliminate all errors or flaws in the process

De minimis non curat lex.

[G-STAR_NYONGESA]

@Purple

How much money is this rerun going to cost the Kenyan taxpayer of money we don’t have? All because of one man and his insatiable greed for power. It’s unconscionable to waste billions in a country where people are dying of hunger and nurses are on strike. The SC made a terrible mistake this time.

Ukweli. Lakini ungeongea hivi pia when there were scandals kwa NYS, Health Ministry na kadhalika ingekua vizuri sana. Pia huko pesa ilikua wasted

[magreb]

@Purple

How much money is this rerun going to cost the Kenyan taxpayer of money we don’t have? All because of one man and his insatiable greed for power. It’s unconscionable to waste billions in a country where people are dying of hunger and nurses are on strike. The SC made a terrible mistake this time.

Oh God, and they told me you were the sharpest tool in the shed. It is not about the money or power. It is about justice. The law expects you to petition a court of law should you feel aggrieved. It is how it is and not how you feel it should be. Would you rather an aggrieved party accepts and moves on while there are options provided for in LAW?

[Hunter_Xp]

kuna ujuaji mwingi sana na team RWNEBP… can you for a minute not cast wild aspersions without facts? the evidence threshold was reached in the case. almost 1/3 results had issues.

[system]

@magreb

Oh God, and they told me you were the sharpest tool in the shed. It is not about the money or power. It is about justice. The law expects you to petition a court of law should you feel aggrieved. It is how it is and not how you feel it should be. Would you rather an aggrieved party accepts and moves on while there are options provided for in LAW?

Let’s say you sat for an exam administered by the knec for which you had prepared very well and attained position #1. Assume the knec failed to print their watermark on the exam paper or there were a few typos. Does that invalidate your performance? Should you be forced to re-sit the entire exam out of knec’s negligence, when you scored way better than your colleagues and there’s no hope of them beating you next time?
The SC ruling was a political one, not legal.

[LowRider]

@Purple

Let’s say you sat for an exam administered by the knec for which you had prepared very well and attained position #1. Assume the knec failed to print their watermark on the exam paper or there were a few typos. Does that invalidate your performance? Should you be forced to re-sit the entire exam out of knec’s negligence, when you scored way better than your colleagues and there’s no hope of them beating you next time?
The SC ruling was a political one, not legal.

Have you already read the whole ruling?

Are you a more qualified legal scholar than the four supreme court justices?

Why didn’t the whole country just wait for your views to determine the legitimacy of the case?

The example you have given is pedestrian. This was not a case brought to the Chief’s homestead huko mashinani. Hizo ndio huamuliwa hivyo

Ktalk Military, Criminal, Aviation and Finance Experts now become legal scholars in a heart beat

[Kasighau]

@Purple

Let’s say you sat for an exam administered by the knec for which you had prepared very well and attained position #1. Assume the knec failed to print their watermark on the exam paper or there were a few typos. Does that invalidate your performance? Should you be forced to re-sit the entire exam out of knec’s negligence, when you scored way better than your colleagues and there’s no hope of them beating you next time?
The SC ruling was a political one, not legal.

This comment should be included in our national Creed. Best ever analogy

[sitaki]

Only the full report will tell the specifics, if the irregularities affected the final figure I am sure it will be shown how, I think that’s why chebukati said he will look at it first before setting a timetable for the new election.
I don’t think 5 SC judges can get such a basic issue wrong, so it’s 20 days of waiting.

[Kasighau]

@LowRider

Have you already read the whole ruling?

Are you a more qualified legal scholar than the four supreme court justices?

Why didn’t the whole country just wait for your views to determine the legitimacy of the case?

The example you have given is pedestrian that was not a case brought to the Chief’s homestead huko mashinani. Hizo ndio huamuliwa hivyo

We are giving our opinions here regarding the outcome of yesterday . we are commenting in the verdict, not the ruling. We reserve to comment in the ruling too. In your attempt to look informed, you are losing your marbles all over a pink handle . Bring substance we debate

[LowRider]

@sitaki

Only the full report will tell the specifics, if the irregularities affected the final figure I am sure it will be shown how, I think that’s why chebukati said he will look at it first before setting a timetable for the new election.
I don’t think 5 SC judges can get such a basic issue wrong, so it’s 20 days now.

Exactly! Its not like they do not know the gravity of the situation. In any case, why risk their career reputations by fraudulently siding with a loser? It was easier to side with Uhuru and the government and have a peaceful night’s sleep

[LowRider]

@Kasighau

We are giving our opinions here regarding the outcome of yesterday . we are commenting in the verdict, not the ruling. We reserve to comment in the ruling too. In your attempt to look informed, you are losing your marbles all over a pink handle . Bring substance we debate

I asked questions. Is that losing one’s marbles? So to you asking questions that do not fit into your stream of thought equates losing one’s marbles? Its a public forum

[Kasighau]

@LowRider

Exactly! Its not like they do not know the gravity of the situation. In any case, why risk their career reputations by fraudulently siding with a loser? It was easier to side with Uhuru and the government.

They may have been intimidated by someone who said his petition was a second chance at redemption

[Kasighau]

@LowRider

I asked questions. Is that losing one’s marbles? So to you asking questions that do not fit into your stream of thought equates losing one’s marbles? Its a public forum

You are right sir

[LowRider]

@Kasighau

They may have been intimidated by someone who said his petition was a second chance at redemption

The one intimidating them was clearly waning in power and influence and the government could have protected them adequately. A decision in support of the government was the easiest route. Even NASA’s supporters deep down were prepared for exactly that.

[sitaki]

@LowRider

Exactly! Its not like they do not know the gravity of the situation. In any case, why risk their career reputations by fraudulently siding with a loser? It was easier to side with Uhuru and the government.

True, the reasoning of most high courts all over the word mostly sides with the electoral body, since most acknowledge the Independence of the same and respect that, whatever the judges saw must have been ground breaking for them to take such a stand.
We can only wait and see that mega bombshell in the full report, it will be an interesting read not only locally.

[sitaki]

But something that I seem not to get is, why allow a judgement to be written latter, is this the standard practice.
By the time a judge makes a rulling they ought to have all the facts available, why the delay in coming up with the justification of a rulling, 2 or 3 days of typesetting would be understandable, but 21 days seem a little bit too many.

[LowRider]

@sitaki

But something that I seem not to get is, why allow a judgement to be written latter, is this the standard practice.
By the time a judge makes a rulling they ought to have all the facts available, why the delay in coming up with the justification of a rulling, 2 or 3 days of typesetting would be understandable, but 21 days seem a little bit too many.

It was not humanly possible to type within the time frame provided by the constitution. What they currently have are notes and jots which will be properly typed and arranged for public consumption. Even in 2013 that is what happened

[AMB_Sunday]

@Young

@Kasighau , Jubilee has the numbers in parliament. after the elections, we embark on a clean up exercise like has never been seen before. the evil society activists, activist judges and the whole judiciary must be sanitized. watajua hawajui!
I await the full ruling and the reason therein of nullifying an election not because there was rigging or the petitioner challenged the numbers, but because someone dint sign a form or another form was a photocopy. it will be very embarrassing and will forever be used as a bad example in law.

Kumtoa Maraga si rahisi. Those are ambitious dreams.