There was no hacking, says French firm.

[Simiyu22]

@kasaman

They knew it could not work ( it can never work…reality ) their intentions was to force a rerun ,through the court. …this was calculated move, with SUPRIME court knowledge

Force a rerun and get the same result. And then infiltrate the system again and re-introduce irregularities? How many cycles?

[WuTang]

Ngojeni kura mpigie yule mnapenda. Otherwise, this tale imechoka kushinda treads za coomer ya a Good Hope Hoe, because it has been overtaken by events.

[Kenyan_Troll]

Hope when the dust settles, someone will be charged with treason.

[inzhener_otmetka]

@Antonio Mascaro

Was the server opened for scrutiny as had been ordered by the courts?

With benefit of hindsight, I’m tempted to think that the insistence of the servers being opened was for an ulterior motive…to introduce the famous “Babuon logarithm” into the system for use as proof later!

[Simiyu22]

@inzhener otmetka

With benefit of hindsight, I’m tempted to think that the insistence of the servers being opened was for an ulterior motive…to introduce the famous “Babuon logarithm” into the system for use as proof later!

“Ulterior motive from above”…Lingual cliche from 1970s Jomo Kenyatta era.

[Willy_Matadi]

@mkiawakati96

A judgment that cannot be intersected by legal minds on both plantiff and defence… That we have to wait for the complete judgment to understand why the judges ruled that way, just shows how the ruling lucks proper judicial precedent.

For your information, it was the burden of the parties before the court to provide the proper judicial precedents for the judges to rely on in determining the case and not the judges to introduce their own. Even Prof. Githu Muigai in his amicus brief kept alluding to fidelity to the whole regime of laws touching on elections from voter registration, nominations, ballot printing, voting, tallying and finally declaration of results. Of interest was the issue of tallying where the absence of over 10,000 form 34As and the fate of almost half a million ballots for voter who voted for only the president or put it the other way, the origin of same number of ballots that found their way into the ballot boxes without an equal corresponding number of ballots for the other position which the IEBC never really got to give any coherent explanation at all. How then would IEBC declare final result having disenfranchised voters in over 10,000 polling stations.

[Simiyu22]

@Willy Matadi

For your information, it was the burden of the parties before the court to provide the proper judicial precedents for the judges to rely on in determining the case and not the judges to introduce their own. Even Prof. Githu Muigai in his amicus brief kept alluding to fidelity to the whole regime of laws touching on elections from voter registration, nominations, ballot printing, voting, tallying and finally declaration of results. Of interest was the issue of tallying where the absence of over 10,000 form 34As and the fate of almost half a million ballots for voter who voted for only the president or put it the other way, the origin of same number of ballots that found their way into the ballot boxes without an equal corresponding number of ballots for the other position which the IEBC never really got to give any coherent explanation at all. How then would IEBC declare final result having disenfranchised voters in over 10,000 polling stations.

So is IEBC missing 10000 form 34As?

[system]

@inzhener otmetka

With benefit of hindsight, I’m tempted to think that the insistence of the servers being opened was for an ulterior motive…to introduce the famous “Babuon logarithm” into the system for use as proof later!

Ninaona bado some of the entitled buttscratcher supporters bado haelewi algorithm ni nini :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

[FieldMarshal_CouchP]

@Bangaiza Salinga

There is a difference between hacking and getting compromised.

Oh, so now the goalposts change? You guys never give up…

[Hunter_Xp]

we

[Willy_Matadi]

@Simiyu22

So is IEBC missing 10000 form 34As?

The issue was raised at the hearing of the petition, IEBC lawyers never addresses it despite there being numerous letters by NASA as part of their evidence requesting for the forms. Either IEBC or its lawyers were incompetent.

[FieldMarshal_CouchP]

@zzzzzzz...

A

As I said before one of the main reason why IEBC lost the case is IEBC lawyers and Uhurus lawyers walikuwa vichwa malenge kabisa. That is why they lost the case. All they did in the supreme court ni kutapa tapa, you remember their inability to answer justice Mwilus question of when a voter decides to cast only one vote where the other 5 will go and the fake IEBC forms.

On this one we agree. When Macharia failed to ansswer this Standard Six civics question (Answer: You return the other five to the PO; OR You insert them into the ballot box unmarked; OR You mark them in a way that they are spoiled ballots) I really had problems with those lawyers.

And they never clearly elaborated that the alleged higher 500,000+ presidential votes differenece was a lie; the difference between the total presidential vote and that of all the women rep candidates is less than 70,000!

[Willy_Matadi]

@Simiyu22

So is IEBC missing 10000 form 34As?

NASA’s contention was that the results were declared without the missing forms.

[Simiyu22]

@FieldMarshal CouchP

On this one we agree. When Macharia failed to ansswer this Standard Six civics question (Answer: You return the other five to the PO; OR You insert them into the ballot box unmarked; OR You mark them in a way that they are spoiled ballots) I really had problems with those lawyers.

And they never clearly elaborated that the alleged higher 500,000+ presidential votes differenece was a lie; the difference between the total presidential vote and that of all the women rep candidates is less than 70,000!

So then how are you in the brigade castigating the supreme court ruling?

[Willy_Matadi]

@FieldMarshal CouchP

Oh, so now the goalposts change? You guys never give up…

There is no change in goal posts, the motive for hacking is to compromise period.

[Hunter_Xp]

Someone explain to me why the third respondent through his lawyer refused ballot scrutiny during the hearing of the case filled by NASA, also explain to me how IEBC who were open to ballot scrutiny reversed position to align with the 3rd respondent after the famous ngatia call to his client. How then again do his minions come here and propose ballot scrutiny that they refused ? what has changed ? did you fix the ballots with your numbers and aligned them with your fake form 34as ? No honor among thieves.

[SnazzyKenyan]

Shait

[kasaman]

@Simiyu22

Force a rerun and get the same result. And then infiltrate the system again and re-introduce irregularities? How many cycles?

Honestly do we have time for such ?

[Ashken]

Maraga stuck out his neck to delay jakuon’s destiny that he inherited from his father jaramogi.

[Nattydread]

@WuTang

Ngojeni kura mpigie yule mnapenda. Otherwise, this tale imechoka kushinda treads za coomer ya a Good Hope Hoe, because it has been overtaken by events.

Uko kwa thread ndani na unanuna. Ni nani alikufungulia?