There is SPLM and SPLM IO. Apparently there are other small splinter rebel groups who have also refused to sign the deal, zile ‘we were not consulted’ nonsense Kenyan politicians pull. I swear there is something very wrong with these people and Africans as a whole.
[SIZE=6]Another rebel faction disowns South Sudan peace deal[/SIZE]
Thursday August 30 2018
https://www.nation.co.ke/image/view/-/4734464/highRes/2093534/-/maxw/600/-/bt6jqwz/-/pagan.jpg
South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA) member Pagan Amum. South Sudanese opposition group of former detainees has disowned the peace deal between the Juba government and the rebels. FILE PHOTO | JENNY VAUGHAN | AFP
In Summary
[ul]
[li]South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA) has disowned the peace deal between the Juba government and the rebels.[/li][li]SSOA says that its negotiator, Mr Deng Alor, consented to the deal without the requisite consultations.[/li][li]Opposition leader Dr Riek Machar has agreed to sign a final peace deal with Juba to end a brutal civil war after initially refusing to do so.[/li][/ul]
The South Sudanese opposition group of former detainees has disowned the peace deal between the Juba government and the rebels.
The South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA) said in a statement that its negotiator, Mr Deng Alor, consented to the deal without the requisite consultations.
The sentiments run contrary to earlier reports that rebel leader Riek Machar had agreed to sign the peace agreement.
DEAL
The Sudan Foreign ministry had confirmed that it had convinced Dr Machar to sign the agreement, adding that he would ink the accord on Thursday.
The SSOA statement, issued by Mr Pagan Amum, said the opposition regretted the initialling of the final text of the peace agreement by Mr Alor.
“We, the SPLM Leaders (Former Political Detainees – FDs) regret the initialling of the ‘final text’ of ARCSS by Cde Deng Alor Kuol as this has been done prematurely and without proper consultations, leaving many issues unresolved to become the bone of contention and seeds of future conflict,” it stated.
“We maintain the position that the outstanding issues that we had raised earlier on need to be resolved satisfactorily and reflected in the final text of the draft agreement before initialling. At this eleventh hour, we can no longer rely on vague assurances of initialling or signing documents with reservations or having points of disagreements bracketed or referred to other bodies for decision,” it stressed.
It said further: “We believe that to negotiate these outstanding issues during the stage of implementation will be a futile exercise."